SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número44Convergent ethics as a response to the unilateralism of individualization and universalization.Habermas’ Postmetaphysical Analysis of Religion índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Praxis Filosófica

versão impressa ISSN 0120-4688versão On-line ISSN 2389-9387

Resumo

TOVAR BOHORQUEZ, José Oliverio. PRINZ’S CONSTITUTION MODEL OF MORAL JUDGMENT: A CRITICAL READING. Prax. filos. [online]. 2017, n.44, pp.107-118. ISSN 0120-4688.

The purpose of this paper is to critically review Prinz’s constitution model. According to commonly suggested models, moral judgment is the result of specific cognitive processes that are intuitive, emotional or rational. According to Prinz, sentimentalist views argue that such judgments are caused by emotions. In contrast, he argues that moral judgment is constituted, not caused, by them. I will expose Prinz’s argument to support his proposal and outline some inconsistencies of it.

Palavras-chave : sentiment; emotion; moral judgment; constitution model.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf )