SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número46Against Moral PurismThe academic responses to the apraxia objection índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Praxis Filosófica

versão impressa ISSN 0120-4688versão On-line ISSN 2389-9387

Resumo

RAMOS UMANA, Leonardo. Murdering, robbing and fornicating: moral absolutes in Aristotle. Prax. filos. [online]. 2018, n.46, pp.199-219. ISSN 0120-4688.  https://doi.org/10.25100/pfilosofica.v0i46.6169.

In book II of Nicomachean Ethics (NE), Aristotle mentions 6 cases for which the formula ‘virtue is the mid-term’ doesn’t apply, i.e., 3 actions and 3 passions where it is impossible to think about a correct mode to execute them, actions and passions that will always be wrong regardless of contexts and agents, which is what we nowadays call “moral absolutes”. Within secondary bibliography, such statement hasn’t brought forward much controversy, but very few or nothing has been observed on the fact that (1) the quality that makes those 6 (actions and passions) reprehensible is also shared by many other actions and passions and, therefore, (2) we would be forced to accept that there’s a quite large list of “moral absolutes” in Aristotle.

Palavras-chave : Virtue; Ethics: Moral Absolutes; Moral Objectivism; Mid-term.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )