SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número47The emotional function of musical education in AristotleReading Marx after Preciado. Rethinking the “fragment on machines” from a transhumanist perspective índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Praxis Filosófica

versão impressa ISSN 0120-4688versão On-line ISSN 2389-9387

Resumo

VELAZQUEZ, José Luis. The appropriation of phronesis (The debate between Gadamer and Tugendhat). Prax. filos. [online]. 2018, n.47, pp.157-167. ISSN 0120-4688.  https://doi.org/10.25100/pfilosofica.v0i47.6618.

For Gadamer, the choosing of the concept phronesis has a goal: to unite hermeneutics with Aristotle’s ethics, and to present the problem of the application of moral knowledge as a model of hermeneutics problem. Considering E. Tugendhat’s critical contributions to the matter, in this paper there’ll be an analysis on some difficulties in Gadamer’s approach, which derive from phronesis’ impossibility to properly apply moral knowledge and to justify what is morally valid. Likewise, it will be shown how these difficulties affect comprehension on moral learning procedural structures and the self-reflecting process.

Palavras-chave : phronesis; hermeneutics, ethics; knowledge; moral; learning.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )