SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número43What is social justice? A new history of its meaning in the transnational legal discourseThe nature of the internal conventionality control and its dissimilar reception in the jurisprudence of the Chilean courts índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Revista Derecho del Estado

versão impressa ISSN 0122-9893

Resumo

CHAVEZ-FERNANDEZ-POSTIGO, José. Balancing and equity: Alexy, Recaséns and the pursuit of reasonableness in legal argumentation. Rev. Derecho Estado [online]. 2019, n.43, pp.107-130. ISSN 0122-9893.  https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n43.05.

This work takes as a starting point that Luis Recaséns Siches' "logic of the reasonable" theory is a predecessor of contemporary theories of legal argumentation such as Robert Alexy's one. Nevertheless, this work does not address this general thesis; its approach is more specific: to compare "balancing" and "equity" as the key concepts of what both authors understand as "reasonableness". This paper aims to throw light on what meaning should be given to "reasonable" within legal argumentation. In this regard, this paper evidences that Recasens' understanding of "reasonable" is comparable to Alexy's model only on the surface and that Recasens' model possesses two distinctive significant contributions which may be useful to show the way towards a lighter meaning of "reasonable" within legal argumentation.

Palavras-chave : Alexy; Recaséns; Balancing; Equity; Reasonableness; Legal Argumentation.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )