SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.18 número30Is the ‘monstrous thesis’ truly cartesian?The nature of technology and its links to science: a realist and analogical perspective índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Discusiones Filosóficas

versão impressa ISSN 0124-6127

Resumo

BERMUDEZ, JUAN PABLO. Can reason establish the goals of action? Assessing interpretations of Aristotle’s theory of agency. discus.filos [online]. 2017, vol.18, n.30, pp.35-62. ISSN 0124-6127.  https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2017.18.30.3.

Scholarship on Aristotle’s theory of action has recently tended towards an intellectualist position, according to which reason is in charge of establishing the ends of actions. A resurgence of anti-intellectualism, according to which establishing ends is a task of character and not of reason, has placed this position under criticism. This paper argues that neither of the two interpretations can suffi ciently account for the complexities of Aristotle’s theory, and suggests an intermediate path that combines the strengths of both while avoiding their difficulties. The crucial problem for intellectualism is that Aristotle asserts explicitly that reason cannot establish the ends of action. The crucial problem for anti-intellectualism is that he also asserts that the rational part of the soul must guide and govern the irrational part. The paper sketches indirect intellectualism, a promising middle path.

Palavras-chave : Aristotle; action; practical rationality; reason; intellectualism; anti-intellectualism; character; deliberation.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf )