SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.21 número36The hybridity of what is necessary a posterioriEthics, history and philosophy of history in Fichte índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Discusiones Filosóficas

versão impressa ISSN 0124-6127

Resumo

GIROMINI, José. The impotence of representations: a criticism of John Searle's social ontology. discus.filos [online]. 2020, vol.21, n.36, pp.79-104.  Epub 09-Dez-2020. ISSN 0124-6127.  https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2020.21.36.6.

John Searle has advocated an intentionalist approach to the social, namely the idea that social reality is created and maintained by certain mental states and speech acts. In this work, we first present a detailed version of Searle’s intentionalist founding arguments based on the connection between collective recognition and language. In the second place, we offer a critique of these arguments, suggesting that they lead us to admit that the foundations of social reality are more practical than representational.

Palavras-chave : Social ontology; normativity; John Searle; philosophy of mind; pragmatism.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )