SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.8 número15Servicing as an efficient condition of administrative procedures, with special emphasis on peruvian administrative lawConfrontation of argumentation premises: weighing of premises in three difficult cases reviewed by colombian constitutional court índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Opinión Jurídica

versão impressa ISSN 1692-2530versão On-line ISSN 2248-4078

Resumo

GRISALES CARDONA, William Esteban. Towards a procedural juridical science not violating human rights. Opin. jurid. [online]. 2009, vol.8, n.15, pp.45-58. ISSN 1692-2530.

This article tries to reflect the need for structuring a procedural juridical science which can guarantee the application of basic rights throughout the process and, especially, during a sentence, as the most relevant procedural act. The need for a reasonable and practical speech becomes evident in a social right state in which people's basic rights are protected and judges are demanded to exercise a judicial activity which goes beyond a simple application of norms in the search for dispensing justice.

Palavras-chave : Argumentation; human rights; rhetoric; speech.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons