Introduction
The study area is located on the west side of the Central Cordillera of Colombia in the Valle del Cauca department, approximately 14 km to the East of El Cerrito municipality (Figure 1). Nivia (2001) mentioned that the region's geology had been considered suitable for the location of mineral deposits.
The Buga Batholith, a predominant unit on this region, host epigenetic Au-Ag mineralization and, according to Cediel & Shaw (2019), "were accreted to the Colombian margin along with slivers of Farallon - Caribbean Colombian Oceanic Plateau (CCOP) oceanic lithosphere in the Late Cretaceous-Paleocene, during the collision of the leading or lateral edge of the CCOP, along the continental margin."
Nonetheless, most of the metallogenetic studies concerning the Buga Batholith have been focused on Ginebra and Buga's municipalities, located to the northwest of the study area. This work contributes to the knowledge of mineral occurrences identified at the southeastern corner of the area defined by Lopez et al. (2018) as the Ginebra sliver, using cartographic, petrographic, and microthermometric data.
Regional Geology
Litho-tectonically, the study area is located on the Pacific Assemblage Terrane (PAT) of the Western Tectonic Realm (WTR) terrane of Cediel et al. (2003). According to the author, this assemblage of possible allochthonous terranes contains mafic-ultramafic complexes, ophiolite sequences, and oceanic sediments that have been affected by multiple phases of tectonic reworking and translation that among others get to an obduction/accretion of the marginal basin assemblage along the paleocontinent.
The main lithostratigraphic units in this region are the Buga Batholith, the Amaime Formation, and the Ginebra Ophiolite Complex, as McCourt (1984), Nivia (2001) reported.
The Buga Batholith is a polyphase pluton (Leal-Mejia et al., 2018) with a composition that changes between hornblende quartz diorite to tonalite (McCourt, 1984). In the interest area, tonalite is the predominant lithology. Paz et al. (2017) concluded that this batholith mixes partially crystallized granitic magma and a mafic magma upon conducting field relationships and petrographic analysis.
Villagomez et al. (2011) placed these rocks in the transition of calc-alkaline to tholeiitic series. According to Tarazona et al. (2017), the Buga Batholith is a syn-tectonic pluton that approached and reworked pre-exist anisotropic structures to migrate and emplaced into the Ginebra Ophiolite Complex. An U/Pb LA-ICPMS on zircon age of 98.79 ± 0.43 Ma by Brito et al. (2010) and Villagomez et al. (2011) suggest a crystallization age for this pluton of 90.6 ±1.3 Ma and 92.1 ± 0.8 Ma U/Pb (Zircon). Afterward, Nivia et al. (2017) dated the Buga Batholith through U/Pb in zircon and got two different ages (88 ± 1.64 Ma and 69 ± 1.41 Ma). Based on these ages, Nivia et al. (2017) has classified the Buga Batholith on two differetn intrusive bodies.
The Amaime Formation was defined by McCourt (1984) as massive tholeiitic basalt with horizons of pillow lavas and local komatiitic basalts, and mention that it is intruded by the plutonic rocks of the Buga Batholith. For Moreno & Pardo (2003), this unit is known as Amaime-Chaucha Complex. They suggested that it is composed of a core of ophiolitic suite intruded by granitoid igneous rocks; besides, pillow and massive basalts of oceanic plateau type are tectonically associated. Nivia (2001) defined the eastern's limit of the unit in the main fault of the Cauca-Almaguer Fault System.
Armas (1984) suggested a pre-Aptian age for these rocks according to the radiometric K/Ar age presented by Brook (1984) for the plutonic rocks of the Buga Batholith (99 ± 4 Ma) that intruded the Amaime Formation. Moreno & Pardo (2003) gave reference to 40Ar/39Ar radiometric data from basalts of this unit that provide an age Cenomanian-Turonian.
The Ginebra Ophiolite Complex was defined by Nivia (2001) as an elongated block of ultramafic rocks with an N-S orientation and a 40km length; the eastern contact is faulted (Guabas-Pradera Fault) with the Amaime Formation and is intruded by the Buga Batholith. The western contact is given by the Palmira-Buga Fault that separates it from Miocene sedimentary units. Espinosa (1985), cited by Nivia (2001), described this unit as a sequence of peridotites, banded gabbros, microgabbros, metabasalts, tuffs, microbreccias, and hyaloclastites, cut by dolerite dikes and plagiogranite veinlets.
Besides, Tarazona et al. (2017) identified the following chronologic polyphase history of the complex: i) crystallization, ii) metamorphism on amphibolite facies, iii) milonitization, iv) mylonitic foliation 1, and v) mylonitic foliation 2.
McCourt (1984) mentioned that this complex was intruded by the Buga Batholith and considered that the radiometric ages of this plutonic body of 113 ± 10 Ma (K/Ar on hornblende, Toussaint et al., 1978), 99 ± 4 Ma (Rb/ Sr on biotite, Brook, 1984) and 114 ± 3 Ma (discordant minerals aged K/Ar, Brook, 1984) suggest that the intrusion of this pluton on the Ginebra Ophiolite Complex was before 100 Ma and assume the age of the intruded unit as Early Cretaceous or Jurassic.
Later in 2017, Nivia et al. reported ages Ar/Ar of 140.28 ± 3.12 Ma (on clinopyroxene) for gabronorites and 90.84 ± 0.78 Ma (on hornblende) for anphilites. These ages are interpreted as crystallization age and reworked age by the Buga Batholith's intrusion on the Ginebra Ophiolite Complex.
Regional Structures
The geographic location of the study area in the WTR of Cediel et al. (2003), composed by a melange of allochthonous terranes (e.g., PAT), gives to the site an intense tectonic deformation that is represented locally by a set of principal faults (i.e., N20-30E; N60-70E; N40-50W). That accommodates the deformation generated into western Colombia's accretionary complex; these faults have a history of complex and multiple events that mainly correspond with significant scale strike-slip movements (Nivia, 2001).
In the study area, the most relevant fault systems correspond to systems N20-30E and N40-50W; the former is known as the "Palestina" type (Lozano, 1986 cited by Nivia, 2001) that places in contact different lithological units defining principal lithological provinces and is compound of the west to east among others by the Palmira-Buga Fault and Guabas-Pradera (Potrerillo) Fault. The latter system is nominated as "Salento" type by the same author and correspond to an echelon arrangement of sinistral faults that move the trace of the N20-30E faults; McCourt (1984) suggested that some of those faults correspond to tensional brittle structures, an idea that authors have used as Sillitoe (1974) to explain the occurrence of metallic deposits on the Andean Mountains.
Methodology
A detailed geologic mapping (1:800 scale) was carried out over a transect of 500 m along the El Chucho creek using the "Anaconda Mapping Method" described by Einaudi (1997). A total of twelve thin-polished sections were analyzed to get a petrographic classification based on the modal abundance of primary minerals and identification of alteration minerals; two of the sections were made as doubly polished thin sections for fluid inclusions purposes. All units were analyzed using an Olympus BX-41 polarizing microscope with transmitted and reflected lights.
Modal mineralogy was determined by point counting of 100 points per thing section, and in the case of hydrothermal alteration, the alteration minerals were attributed to primary minerals from which they were formed; the recommendations of Whitney & Evans (2010) for abbreviations form mineral names, and the guidance of the Subcommission on the Systematics of Igneous Rocks (Streckeisen, 1976) were followed for petrographic characterization.
Microthermometric measurements in fluid inclusions were carried out in the National University of Colombia laboratories, Bogotá, using a Linkam THSM 600 stage coupled to an Olympus BX41 petrographic microscope. The equipment accuracy was estimated at +1°C to the lowest temperature and +4.7°C for the highest; the heating and cooling rate are 150°C/min and 100°C/min respectively, researching temperatures of -196°C to 600°C. Three-phase changes were recorded during the cooling/heating routines: (1) Eutectic temperature (Te), (2) final ice melting temperature (Tmlce), (3) homogenization temperature (Th).
The compositions of mineralizing fluids were modeled by the BULK program from Fluids package (Bakker, 2003; Bakker & Brown, 2003), using the equations for salinity calculation, given by Bodnar (1993) and the state equation of Zhang & Frantz (1987) for estimating the type of components in the inclusions.
Results
Geologic Mapping
In the El Chucho creek, the predominant lithology is a moderated magnetic, light pinkish coarse, equigranular, phaneritic rock, composed mainly of subhedral plagioclases (30 % vol), anhedral quartz (25 % vol), and subhedral hornblende (20 % vol). The mineral occurrences (pyrite, chalcopyrite, and traces of molybdenite) are disseminated in thin quartz veinlets (< 1cm) (3 veinlets); all of them complete almost 5 % vol; finally, alteration minerals such as carbonate, chlorite, epidote, sericite and locally biotite (near to dykes intrusions) complete 20 % vol; this mineral composition allow for classifying the rock as tonalite. It is frequent to find lobular contacts with greenish-grey aphanitic basalts, with disseminated fine-grained pyrite, chalcopyrite, and magnetite completing all of them (3 % vol); those rocks are spatially correlated with the Buga Batholith.
In the mapped area, this tonalite is intruded by five porphyritic dykes (45/040; 59/071; 70/135; 70/135 and 44/090) of grey to dark brown color, with aphanitic matrix (~70 % vol) and phenocrysts (~30 % vol) of plagioclase and hornblende of < 1cm, besides of disseminated moderate alteration of carbonate + sericite and pyrite and chalcopyrite disseminated and/or in quartz veinlets occasionally with molybdenite (1 veinlet) and rarely gypsum veinlets ≤ 1 cm thick (1 veinlet); those dykes have two to three meter thick and compositionally are quartz-dioritic to tonalitic.
These sub-volcanic pulses could have given path to fluids that generated a moderate hydrothermal alteration that affected mainly the tonalitic host rock. The identified hydrothermal alteration are (1) moderate propylitic alteration, with a pervasive distribution and in a minor quantity present as straight veinlets of Ep + Qz + Cb ± Chl ± Py ± Mag, sulphurs and oxides as Py, Ccp and Mag are disseminated on the rock; (2) moderate phyllic alteration (seems related with local faults), with mineral association Qz + Ser + Py ± Chl and straight veinlents of Ccp and D-type veinlets (Gustafson & Hunt, 1975), this alteration affects an important portion of the phaneritic tonalite; (3) local very weak potassic alteration, characterized by scarce secondary biotite disseminated on the phaneritic tonalite near to contact zones with porphyritic dykes; also it is possible to find ore minerals as Ccp (3 % vol) and Mol (1 % vol) in B-type veinlets (Gustafson & Hunt, 1975) and disseminated.
Structurally, the zone is controlled by a fragile regime where it is possible to recognize four principal oblique faults (1) N75E/75SE, (2) N80W/53SE, (3) N55E/76NW and (4) N80W/58NW; the first and second with normal sinistral movement and the third and fourth normal dextral movements (Figure 2 and Figure 3).
Petrographyc Analysis
Table 1 and Figure 4 present the data used for modal rock classification.
a Unit abbreviation: To Ph = Phaneritic tonalite, To Po = Porphyritic tonalite, Qd Po = Porphyritic Quartz-diorite.
b Mineral abbreviation: Qz = quartz, Afs = Alkali feldspar, Pl = Plagioclase, Chl = Chlorite, Ep = Epidote, Cb = Carbonate, Py = Pyrite, Ccp = Chalcopyrite, Cct = Chalcocite, Mol = Molybdenite, Cv = Covellite, Ser = Sericite, Bt = Biotite, Bt 2 = Secondary biotite, Hbl = Hornblende, Cpx = Clinopiroxene, Spn = Sphene, Zrn = Zircon.
Tonalites
These rocks are holocrystalline with anhedral to subhedral crystals and appear with phaneritic (1) and porphyritic (2) texture, that are described as follow:
(1) The phaneritic phase (samples 1247, 1257, 1260, 1261, 1262 and Mbch07), is holocrystalline with subhedral to anhedral crystals, plagioclase is the most abundant mineral (45 to 67 % vol) (An33) with antipertitic texture, quartz (33 to 54 % vol) with local mirmequitic texture, alkali feldspar (≤ 4 % vol), hornblende (~3 % vol), less than 1 % vol of pyroxene, pyrite and chalcopyrite (6 % vol) disseminated and in quartz veinlets (< 1 cm thickness). Sericite is a common alteration product of plagioclase, while epidote, chlorite and carbonate are frequently alteration product of both, plagioclase and hornblende; scarce secondary biotite appears as a substituent of hornblende (Figure 5 A and B).
(2) The porphyritic phase (samples 1258, Mbch04, Mbch05, Mbch09 and Mbchll) has a fine to medium-grained matrix (75 % vol) composed of crystals of plagioclase, quartz, alkali feldspar and hornblende; phenocrysts (25 % vol) consists of medium to coarse grained subhedral to anhedral crystals of plagioclase (55 to 78 % vol) (An32), quartz (22 to 45 % vol), hornblende (<9 % vol) and alkali feldspar (<4 % vol). Plagioclase as well as hornblende are altered to carbonate, chlorite, epidote and secondary biotite (scarce); sulphide minerals as pyrite and chalcopyrite (~3 % vol) are present disseminated and in quartz veinlets (≤ 1 cm thickness). Sphene and zircon are accessory minerals (Figure 5 C and D).
Quartz diorite
This rock (sample Mbch08) is holocrystalline with a porphyritic medium to fine-grained texture, and has a criptocrystalline matrix (80 % vol) composed by plagioclase, quartz, magnetite and chalcopyrite; the phenocrysts (20 % vol) are mainly of euhedral plagioclase (An10) (28 vol %) with sericitic alteration, subhedral quartz (5 vol%) and (20 vol%) of euhedral to subhedral hornblende altered to chlorite, epidote and carbonate. Sulphide minerals as pyrite, chalcopyrite and molybdenite (4 % vol) are disseminated into B-type veinlets (Figure 5 E and F).
Microthermometry Analysis
Fluid inclusions characteristics
The occurrence of two types of fluid inclusions assemblages was stablished, Table 2 shows the characteristics and the average microthermometric and salinity data for both types of fluid inclusions.
a and b data correspond to the average of the data measured and calculated on each type of fluid inclusion.
Type I fluid inclusions are common in sample 1262 (phaneritic tonalite), those fluid inclusions were measured in a veinlet of 1 cm thick, compound only by quartz, over a zone of phyllic alteration. Type II fluid inclusions are typical in sample 1257 (phaneritic tonalite), and are found in 1 cm thick quartz veinlet with chalcopyrite and copper silicates, associated with molybdenite.
Type I inclusions: Primary, biphasic aqueous FI found at the centre or growth zone of crystals, with ovoid and irregular shapes, whose size vary between 4 - 11 um and L/V ratio between 12 - 89.
Type II inclusions: Primary, biphasic aqueous FI found mainly at the centre zone of crystals, whose shapes vary among ovoid, irregular and tabular, the size of the inclusion vary between 4 - 9 um and the L/V ratio is between 14 - 44. (Figure 6).
Microthermometric Results
These results are presented separately according to the fluid inclusion type; the composition, and salinity of both type of inclusions were modeled on the BULK program from Fluids package (Bakker, 2003; Bakker & Brown, 2003).
Type I fluid inclusions: The first observed change of phase corresponds to the first melting temperature of ice (Te) ranging from -46 to -15°C with a major data concentration at -35.2°C. Ice final melting temperature (Tmlce) ranging from -4.5 to -1.2°C; all inclusions homogenize (Th) to liquid phase (L+V →L) at a temperature ranging from 125 to 480°C with an important data concentration at an approximate temperature of 285°C. These data indicate a salinity of 7.2 to 2.1 wt % NaCl equivalent (eq.) (4.7 on average) (Figure 7).
Type II fluid inclusions: As Type I fluid inclusion, these inclusions shown the first phase change at the first melting temperature of ice from -38 to -14°C. The ice final melting temperature ranging between -5.1 to -0.9°C with an important data concentration at -3.1°C, the homogenization temperature occurs at temperature range between 100 - 139°C showing a homogenization to liquid phase too (L+V →L). The salinity calculated vary between 8.0 and 1.6 wt % NaCl (eq.) (4.8 on average) (Figure 7).
Discussion
Geologic mapping and petrographic analysis carried out on the El Chucho creek, suggest that the molybdenite and chalcopyrite mineral occurrences reported are associated with a very weak potassic hydrothermal alteration due to the presence of B-type veins and scarse shreddy secondary biotite; this high temperature alteration was overprinted mainly by propylitic and phyllic alteration. According to field relationships the mineralizing fluids analyzed seem to be related with the intrusion of minor tonalitic and quartz dioritic dykes.
The microthermal data show two different hydrothermal fluids related with the mineral occurrences.
1) The microthermometric data of Type I fluid inclusions suggest a higher temperature event that according to the diagram of Wilkinson (2001) could fit on both, an epithermal or an intrusion-related system for the study area (Figure 8), furthermore, some of the ore minerals (Py, Ccp, Mol) and hydrothermal alteration (potassic, phyllic, propylitic) found in the El Chucho creek could be related with both deposit types (Wilkinson, 2001; Camprubi et al., 2003 and Hart & Goldfarb, 2005). Moreover, the interpolation of the study area over the map presented by López et al. (2018) shows that the study area is near (at less than ~10 km) to a prospective zone for intrusion-related deposits (Figure 9). However, some typical characteristics of intrusion-related system as the presence of fluorite, greisen alteration and the presence of CO2 as a phase in fluid inclusions, were not observed and more importantly the presence of magnetite in the area suggest oxidized magmatism, those facts break down the hypothesis of intrusion-related but let open the possibility of an epithermal telescoped system.
2) Type II fluid inclusions show a lower temperatures that fit within the Volcanic Massive Sulphide Kuroko type deposits of Wilkinson (2001) (Figure 8) ; although the typical geometry and zonation of this deposit type as described by Ohmoto (1996) was not observed in the field, the regional geologic setting could be appropriate for this deposit type (i.e., volcanic sequences of marine origin as the Amaime Formation and Ginebra Ophiolite Complex).
Additionally, some microthermal data for Type I fluid inclusions could be interpreted as a leakage of inclusion during heating (Shepherd et.al., 1985), due to the high temperature showed without any salinity change related.
On the other hand, those different hydrothermal fluids (Type I and Type II fluid inclusions) could be related simply with a transition zone in the same hydrothermal system, this hypothesis is supported mainly by the field observations (i.e., a very weak and local presence of secondary biotite that seems related with contact zone of porphyritic dykes with the phaneritic tonalite, B-type veinlets, a frequent moderate and pervasive propylitic alteration, and a overprint of phyllic alteration structurally controlled), so according to these, the changes on fluids could obeying to the distance from the contact zone (e.g., porphyritic dykes), where the higher homogenization temperature are from those fluid inclusions related with potassic alteration on the contacts zone and lower homogenization temperature are from fluid inclusions on phyllic alteration zones.
Conclusions and recommendations
The petrography of inclusions suggest that the mineralizing fluids were trapped under low volatile content, due to the size relation of the volatile phase respect to the total size of the inclusion (L/V ratio).
According to the field observations and the differences on homogenization temperatures between the two hydrothermal fluids, we assume that mineral occurrences are related with two different hydrothermal fluids (1) of higher temperature related with the potassic alteration (secondary biotite + pyrite ± chalcopyrite ± molybdenite) close to the contact zone of porphyritic intrusions and (2) of lower temperature related with phyllic alteration (sericite + carbonate + pyrite) related with faults zones.
Due to the lack of mapping evidence on this research that support the hypothesis of any specific deposit type (intrusion-related, epithermal, VMS), is strongly suggested to carry out an extended cartography with the aim of finding any data that give support to any of those assumptions.