SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.17 número32Reflective Judgment, Common Sense, and Exemplariness A Study on the Paradigm of Judgment and its Reception by Alessandro Ferrara and Hannah ArendtEndoxa, Hypólepsis Parádoxos and Martyría in Aristotle’s Theory of Slavery índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Co-herencia

versão impressa ISSN 1794-5887

Resumo

AIKIN, Scott F.. What Optimistic Responses to Deep Disagreement get Right (and Wrong). Co-herencia [online]. 2020, vol.17, n.32, pp.225-238. ISSN 1794-5887.  https://doi.org/10.17230/co-herencia.17.32.8.

In this paper, I argue for three theses. First, that the problem of Deep Disagreement is usefully understood as an instance of the skeptical Problem of the Criterion. Second, there are structural similarities between proposed optimistic answers to deep disagreement and the problem of the criterion. Third, in light of these similarities, there are both good and bad consequences for proposed solutions to the problem of deep disagreement.

Palavras-chave : Deep disagreement; skepticism; problem of the criterion; argumentation.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf )