SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.33 número2Avaliação de parâmetros biológicos e físicas da água de clínicas odontológicas de uma universidade brasileiraDiferenças na morfologia óssea entre o lado deslocado e o lado contralateral em pacientes com assimetria facial: estudo 3D-CT índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


CES Odontología

versão impressa ISSN 0120-971X

Resumo

CERVEIRA-VALOIS-DE-SA, Tatiana et al. Evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of propolis toothpastes on oral pathogens. CES odontol. [online]. 2020, vol.33, n.2, pp.12-22.  Epub 13-Jul-2021. ISSN 0120-971X.  https://doi.org/10.21615/cesodon.33.2.2.

Introduction and objective:

The incorporation of propolis in dentifrices aims to more effectively assist the control and prevention of oral pathologies through the elimination of pathogens present in the biofilm. However, little is known about the antimicrobial efficacy of different products on the market for microorganisms for these conditions. The aim of this study was to investigate the antimicrobial action of three propolis-containing dentifrices on oral pathogens.

Material and methods:

The agar diffusion method was used to analyze three propolis-based dentifrices, including: Noplak Max®, Protta® and Forever Bright®. A non-propolis dentifrice (Malvatrikids®) was employed as a negative control. Positive controls were 0.2% chlorhexidine, further diluted 30% to match the chlorhexidine concentration of one of the evaluated dentifrices and 11% propolis extract (Apis Flora®). For the determination of antimicrobial activity the strains of Fusobacterium nucleatum and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus acidophilus and Candida albicans were used.

Results:

Of the tested dentifrices, Protta® and Forever Bright® showed inhibitory action against S. mutans, E. faecalis and C. albicans microorganisms. Noplak® dentifrice showed low antimicrobial activity, being limited to S. mutans and E. faecalis. When there was an antimicrobial effect, the diameter of the growth inhibition halos ranged from 9mm to 28.83mm.

Conclusion:

The use of a propolis-containing dentifrice for eventual use as a therapeutic adjunct in dentistry is fully justified, considering the pharmacological activities.

Palavras-chave : enfermedades periodontales; caries dental; dentífrico; propóleos; periodontal diseases; dental caries; dentifrice; propolis.

        · resumo em Português | Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )