English (pdf)
Article in xml format
Article references
Automatic translation
Send this article by e-mail
Cited by SciELO 
Cited by Google 
Similars in
SciELO 
Similars in Google 
Permalink
I. INTRODUCTION
Currently, most of the students entering universities belong to Generation Z [1]. Their native technological skills [2] can be combined with today's diverse ways of consuming information [3] to reach higher levels of learning. The Internet meme is an active learning technique that meets these conditions. They take the form of images (pictures, animations such as GIFs) taken from other media, e.g., television or film, or photographs from everyday life, often with text juxtaposed with specific phrases or quotes. Internet memes are quite reusable, which is why their popularity has increased among students but also among teachers who want to use this tool to enhance their students learning. They have spread on the Internet in various ways: social networks, forums, blogs, or instant messaging [5], [6]. Despite their benefits, there are copyright concerns in education; however, these images can be declared “fair use” and, therefore, do not infringe copyright [7].
Internet memes have been used in several areas of knowledge; even so, there are few experiences in engineering. In mathematics, internet memes were based on three main aspects: structural, social, and specialized [8]. In Pharmacy, the students generated content through them [4]. It also motivated to learn English [9], helped students learn petroleum engineering English vocabulary quickly and in a solid way [10], promoted critical thinking in political science [11], and helped students review content when preparing their final chemistry test [12], among others. As can be seen, few studies have been conducted in the literature that used internet memes for educational purposes. Only one was related to the civil engineering career and none to the geometric road design course. In this subject, teachers are reluctant to include active learning methods due to the high need of physics and mathematics.
In this context, this study aims to present an academic activity that uses internet memes to help students analyze a weekly topic before the synchronous virtual class of the geometric road design course. To explain the results of this experience, the rest of the document first presents the methods; then, it presents the results and their subsequent discussion.
II. METHODOLOGY
A. Course Selection
The subject Road Construction I at the Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja (UTPL), Ecuador, was taught virtually due to the COVID-19 restrictions. This subject had several learning moments: watching a prerecorded lecture, problem-solving, application to real projects, and presentation of progress [13]. One of those moments applies flipped learning, where the student must review a video prepared by the instructor before attending the synchronous virtual class. However, this was not always the case; thus, it was decided to apply random control readings before starting the virtual session. The creation of this instrument took a considerable amount of time, even so, some students did not review the videos. Therefore, to motivate students to watch it before attending the virtual class, internet memes were included with two planned academic activities: image elaboration and peer review.
B. Selection of Groups
Four groups of students participated in the use of internet memes in flipped learning. All group members were enrolled in the subject of Road construction I at UTPL for two academic periods. Group A (n=56 students enrolled in the course) and B (n=58) during April-August 2021, groups C (n=32) and D (n=43) from October 2021 to February 2022. All groups had the same instructor and they received the same content of the subject.
C. Procedure for Using Internet-Memes
Each week, the students were required to review the pre-recorded lecture. After reviewing these videos, the students made an internet meme adding the information seen in the weekly video. The instructor delivered a static meme template to create the meme. The creation was uploaded to the virtual learning environment (VLE). Then, the VLE automatically assigned them two images to be graded. Students rated their peers' images using the rubric in Table 1. Then, they attended a problem-solving session (Wednesday, 2 hours) and the application of the weekly topic to a real project (Thursday, 3 hours). Subsequently, the students had to make an oral presentation as a team or present an infographic of the progress of the weekly project. After these activities, the next topic began with a new process starting with the visualization of the pre-recorded master class. The images were graded zero when the file was not uploaded, not understood, or not related to the weekly topic.
Table 1 Internet meme evaluation rubric.
| Criterion | Score | % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outstanding 4 points | Regular 2 points | Deficient 1 point | ||
|
|
It shows that they reviewed all the shared material. | They watched and reviewed the material, but some parts are unclear. | It seems that they did not review the shared material. | 40 |
|
|
The image is very creative. | The image is creative. | The image is not creative. | 40 |
|
|
The image has a good quality. | The image has a certain quality. | The image has no quality. | 20 |
Only three evaluation criteria were placed in the rubric, as shown in Table 1, so it was easier for peer evaluation. The lack of practice as critics of the homework of their classmates can become complicated with more criteria. Also, the rubric was related to the criteria (structure, social, and specialized) of a previous investigation in a mathematics course [8]. The grades of the evaluating pairs were averaged to prevent students from feeling unfairness. The internet memes were 10% of the final grade of the course.
When it comes to peer-review-based learning there are several elements to consider. First, students had the same template and topic every week, so diverse outcomes were expected. This result is because students combined what they understood about the topic with their creativity on the internet meme creation. Second, in the peer review, they had to indirectly compare the way others approached the topic with the image they made. This review will also provide the opportunity to enhance the creation of the internet meme. In addition, they will improve in the peer review by observing how the other classmates evaluated the image. The possibility that the student understands the weekly topic increases with these learning moments. They can also have a better result if they know the topic before attending the synchronous virtual class.
D. Data Collection
The data collection was conducted using three principal sources: the final grades, the average scores of the internet memes, and a survey. 53 students from group A answered the survey; group B, 56; group C, 21; and group D, 43. The instructor shared the survey in week 15 through the VLE an it was a voluntary activity. However, the instructor offered an additional 1% in the final grade for those who participated, regardless of their positive or negative answers.
III. RESULTS
A. Creation of Internet-Memes
Figure 1 shows some examples of the creation of internet memes. Interestingly, the student must analyze how the template has been used previously and what is the context in order to make them. For example, the week two template references scenes from the movie Finding Neverland; the first scene features a teary-eyed boy saying why he is upset, followed by a scene where the adult looks at him sympathetically, and a final part where the two of them hug [14]. On the internet meme created by students, the boy tells the adult that he has had a road accident for not slowing down his vehicle, then the adult (in the second part) asks about the type of workload that the road generates in the driver, the boy replies that it was high. With a high workload, the driver can make mistakes; thus, the limitations of the drivers and their relationship with the road design have been understood.
The internet meme template from week three is a modified image of rapper Drake. This meme came from scenes from the single Hotline Bling, in which the artist performs various dance moves [15]. This time, the meme has been modified by changing the artist and placing Goku, the main character of the Dragon Ball cartoon, but the gestures that made this meme famous are maintained. In this case, the student has placed an image of a vehicle with a load over the maximum allowed. In the second scene, it shows what should be the right thing to do, i.e., respect the maximum load. With this simple image, the student relates the concept that exceeding the maximum load of the road can have severe consequences for the life of the pavement structure.
In the template of week six, one of the scenes of the film Intelligent Student with the Nigerian actor Chinedu Ikedieze is represented. The origin of the meme is a scene when the actor cried because his father stole the money the boy earned working on the street [16]. They are used to exemplify the reaction to a succession of complicated situations. In this case, the student shows the child's frustration when asked to design a road in a mountainous topography, and then, in the second scene, it is mentioned that only simple circular curves can be used. The geometric design of roads is more complex in mountainous terrain than in flat terrain. Moreover, although simple circular curves adapt well to this type of terrain, compound circular curves adapt better to it, so these would have fewer nature modifications, therefore, lower construction costs. On this occasion, the student has exceeded the expectations of the weekly topic content since he has linked two previous academic matters.
Two scenes of the TikTok® user Khaby Lame (@khaby.lame) [17] body language appear in the week 11 template. Lame's videos on this social network show complicated situations that can be resolved more easily. The expressions on his face have become a meme. The student, in the first panel, put an image of a vehicle that rollovers in horizontal curves, and whose solution - shown in the second panel -is superelevation. Although the lack of adequate superelevation is not the only cause of an accident in this type of curve, the student has understood the relationship between vehicular traffic and the geometric design of the cross-section in a curve.
B. Peer Review
Figure 2 shows the weekly grades of the images of all the groups. There is a considerable dispersion in the first weeks, possibly because the students are adapting to this learning moment - both the elaboration and the peer review -, not only to the use of an image editing program, but to the relationship between the image and the text. The latter is what makes the creation complicated. Also, they must be creative by adding scientific content to an image used in other contexts. Students like to consume internet memes, but their elaboration is much more complex.
Around the first eight weeks, the student already knows how to make an internet meme. Then, the grades are more uniform and with less dispersion. Moreover, the students have little experience in grading the work of other students, so those eight weeks serve also as an adaptation period to the evaluation rubric, and to giving and receiving critics on the images. If the average values of the groups are analyzed, groups B and D have a more uniform trend, that is, in the first eight weeks, the ratings increase until they reach values close to 10 points. After that, the ratings continue increasing but more slowly, that is, with a lower slope than in the first eight weeks. This trend is not noticeable in groups A and C, whose average values in 1-8 weeks or 8-16 weeks have very varied values without any observable trend.
C. Final Grades
Table 2 shows the final grades of the groups. In this table, two groups that resemble each other can be distinguished: A and C, and B and D. The former has higher failure rates than the latter. It also has lower grade point averages than groups B and D. There is a higher dispersion in groups A and C than in groups B and D. The same trend is observed in the confidence interval.
D. Students’ Perception
In the survey, the students answered four questions where they had to select a value between 1-10, one being the lowest and ten the highest. The categories evaluated were general grade of the course, self-study, elaboration of internet memes, and the peer grade (see Table 3). Group B has the highest rating, which coincides with the highest average rating. This outcome suggests that the "best students" value the course in a better way.
Table 3 Scores of student's perceptions of the activities carried out in the group.
| Descriptive statistic | Overall score of the course | Self-learning | Internet memes creation | Peer review |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ave. ± CI95% (A) | 8.86 ± 0.35 | 7.47 ± 0.59 | 8.30 ± 0.63 | 7.95 ± 0.73 |
| Ave. ± CI95% (B) | 9.16 ± 0.32 | 7.63 ± 0.47 | 9.05 ± 0.42 | 8.28 ± 0.50 |
| Ave. ± CI95% (C) | 8.86 ± 0.59 | 8.43 ± 0.67 | 8.71 ± 0.69 | 8.43 ± 0.75 |
| Ave. ± CI95% (D) | 8.84 ± 0.27 | 8.05 ± 0.45 | 9.42 ± 0.31 | 9.26 ± 0.42 |
As far as self-learning is concerned, the groups that perceived more work (such as group C) have a lower average score. This trend also suggests that the groups with “worse students” consider that they do a better job than the rest. This trend should be explored in future studies.
The confidence intervals between these two pairs of groups (A-C and B-D) are very similar, as previously detected in the final grades. The same is observed in the confidence intervals for the peer review. Despite these differences between groups, the average values were higher than 8.3/10. So, in general, the students are satisfied with this activity. In turn, the peer review showed a reduction in the score assigned concerning the internet memes creation. This reduction in students’ satisfaction may be because they do not like the activity, they are not used to criticizing the work of their classmates, to use grading rubrics, or they disagree with the rubric criteria or even with using it. A combination of all the above may be possible; however, it should be further studied in later works. Despite these reductions, the average minimum rating was 7.95; thus, most agree with this trend.
IV. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
The data suggest that students can successfully use internet memes to analyze course topics before attending synchronous virtual classes. They were used as an alternative to reading controls; however, the images cannot be considered as the only learning activity, it must be complemented with others.
The creation of internet memes can be complicated at first, but if the images are expressive and evocative, users can go from pure consumers to producers, as in Baozou emoticons [18]. In this investigation, students improved that skill as weeks passed. It is necessary to mention that the students had no previous experience with images in any other course. Moreover, not everyone will like this activity since students have different learning styles.
Regarding the images’ peer review, despite having a low rating, this type of learning is based on previous literature [19]. This activity allows students to develop critical thinking, which is necessary in the civil engineering profession [20]. Despite the good results, internet memes do not solve the problem of complex concepts, they rather simplify the complex procedure of any subject taught by the teacher [3]. We must also consider that not all internet memes are good or not all are closely related to the weekly topic. Some images were submitted without prior review of the template or watching the prerecorded lecture; however, students can have a fun time producing or grading internet memes, which would positively affect them in university classrooms. Instructors can also enjoy this activity and reduce the working hours because students evaluate the creations.
Further research is needed to establish the relationship between final grades and job satisfaction as some interesting trends were found here. It should also be analyzed why students are less satisfied with peer review than with the internet memes creation. Likewise, why the groups with lower grades consider that they do more self-learning than the groups with higher grades, and the latter experience greater satisfaction than the first ones. Finally, the rubric that contains structural, social, and specialized criteria [8] is adequate for this type of evaluation.
This research has several limitations. First, the study only focused on one subject from a single university in Latin America. Students received the internet meme templates; therefore, they could not present images of their liking or the most common for them. Despite these limitations, the study is a first experience using these images in courses related to geometric design. It offers details of an experience using internet memes as a flipped learning activity complemented by peer review. The evidence suggests that they can be used in other courses that have a content based on physics and mathematics.
