The challenge of asymptomatic carriers of COVID-19: A rapid review of literature

Albavera-Hernández, Cidronio; Rodríguez-Hernández, Jorge M.; Piñeros-Garzón, Flor S.; Montoya-Sanabria, Sandra M.; Albavera-Hernández, Cidronio; Rodríguez-Hernández, Jorge M.; Piñeros-Garzón, Flor S.; Montoya-Sanabria, Sandra M.

doi:10.15446/rsap.v22n6.91181

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Cited by SciELO
Access statistics

Revista de Salud Pública

Print version ISSN 0124-0064

Rev. salud pública vol.22 no.6 Bogotá Nov./Dec. 2020 Epub Mar 15, 2021

https://doi.org/10.15446/rsap.v22n6.91181

Review

The challenge of asymptomatic carriers of COVID-19: A rapid review of literature

El desafío de los portadores asintomáticos de COVID-19: una revisión rápida de la literatura

Cidronio Albavera-Hernández¹

Jorge M. Rodríguez-Hernández²

Flor S. Piñeros-Garzón³

Sandra M. Montoya-Sanabria⁴

^¹ CA: MD. Family Medicine Specialist. M.Sc.; D.Sc. Epidemiology. Mexican Institute of Social Security. Regional General Hospital with Family Medicine No.1. Cuernavaca, Mexico. cidronio.albavera@imss.gob.mx

^² JR: MD. M.Sc.; D.Sc. Epidemiology. Institute of Public Health. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Bogotá, Colombia. jrodriguez.h@javeriana.edu.co

^³ FP: RN. M.Sc. University of the Llanos. Villavicencio, Colombia. fpineros@unillanos.edu.co.

^⁴ SM: RN. M.Sc.; Ph.D.(c). Public Health. Institute of Public Health. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Bogotá, Colombia. montoya.smilena@javeriana.edu.co

ABSTRACT

Objectives

To describe the epidemiological and sociodemographic characteristics of asymptomatic carriers reported in the literature, and to review the strategies used for diagnosis and control.

Methods

Systematic literature review approach. As inclusion criteria, all studies published between January 1 and June 26, 2020, conducted in humans, that reported people who remained asymptomatic of COVID-19. Descriptors were adapted to the interfaces of eight bibliographic databases were configured: PubMed, Ovid, SciELO, Ebsco, Scopus, LILACS, Epistemonikos and Embase.

Results

About 45% of the articles reported adult population, thirteen reported mixed population (adult and pediatric). 3 525 asymptomatic people were reported, with an average of 37,1 years [0.5-82 years]. Although the effectiveness of the control and prevention measures was not reported, the identification, isolation and follow-up of contacts stands out as a potential effective mechanism to prevent the transmission.

Conclusions

The use of this information could be relevant to guide evidence-based public health policies and the protection of populations and the improvement of health care that contributes to stopping this pandemic.

Key Words: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; carrier state; prevention and control (source: MeSH, NLM)

RESUMEN

Objetivos

Describir las características epidemiológicas y sociodemográficas de los portadores asintomáticos reportadas en la literatura y revisar las estrategias utilizadas para el diagnóstico y control.

Métodos

Se realizó una revisión sistemática de la literatura. Se incluyeron todos los estudios publicados entre el 1.° de enero y el 26 de junio de 2020 realizados en humanos que informaron personas que permanecieron asintomáticas por COVID-19. Se adaptaron descriptores a las interfaces de ocho bases de datos bibliográficas: Pub-Med, Ovid, SciELO, Ebsco, Scopus, LILACS, Epistemonikos y Embase.

Resultados

Aproximadamente el 45% de los artículos reportaron población adulta, trece estudios informaron población mixta (adultos y pediátricos). Se identificaron 3 525 personas asintomáticas, con un promedio de 37,1 años [0,5-82 años]. Si bien no se reportó efectividad de medidas de control y prevención, la identificación, aislamiento y seguimiento de los contactos se destaca como un potencial mecanismo efectivo para prevenir la transmisión.

Conclusiones

El uso de esta información podría ser relevante para orientar las políticas de salud pública basadas en la evidencia y la protección de las poblaciones y la mejora de la atención médica que contribuya a detener esta pandemia.

Palabras Clave: Infecciones por coronavirus; virus del SARS; portado sano; prevención & control (fuente: DeCS, BIREME)

For many years, in epidemiology and public health, asymptomatic carriers have been defined as those people who behave like a vector: they transmit the disease; however, they may or may not develop signs and symptoms of the event that they potentially transmit. Therefore, they can do it during the incubation period, during convalescence or post-convalescence ¹. As Gordis refers, a carrier is a person who has the infectious agent, but is not sick, nor have evidence of signs and symptoms of clinical manifestations. They can infect other people. A healthy carrier can have a limited duration or it can be chronic, in that sense it can last days, weeks, months or in rare cases, years ².

There are not many diseases or cases in which asymptomatic carriers have been described, such as Hepatitis A, Typhoid Fever, among others. The case of Mary the Typhoid is very famous, a woman of British origin who is credited with at least three deaths and fifty people who fell ill with Typhoid Fever in New York City at the beginning of the last century ³^,⁴. The asymptomatic carrier is challenging for public health and health services because, as with Mary, it can trigger an outbreak at a certain time and place.

Since December 31, 2019, the world has undergone changes in several areas. The first days they failed to identify the origin of the outbreak. On January 7,2020, the causative agent, a virus of the Coronaviridae family, was identified. The genetic sequence of the virus was shared on January 12,2020, called SARS-CoV-2 ⁵^-⁸. From the first month of starting COVID-19, it began to spread to other countries on the Asian continent and then to other continents.

The COVID-19 situation is very complex, since they have been reported from acute, pre-symptomatic and asymptomatic carriers to people with mild, moderate, severe and fatal symptoms ⁹,¹⁰ The former behave as vectors, which is a challenge for the detection of cases, isolation, follow-up, contact management, and in general all the epidemiological control that must be done with the health services of a territory ¹¹.

COVID-19 has been the largest pandemic in the past 100 years. Despite the efforts made by the world scientific community, there is still no definitive cure. Due to the easy spread of the virus, multiple global questions remain to be answered, and within them is the role of people who transmit the virus without manifesting symptoms, and who, as previously mentioned, can be classified as asymptomatic and presymptomatic. The first are those who, even when carrying the virus, never develop the disease, that is, they remain completely asymptomatic during the course of the infection, and never manifest symptoms in any apparatus and system; presymptomatic patients transmit the pathogen agent a few days before symptoms begin ¹⁰^,¹².

This quick review of the literature had two objectives. First, to describe the epidemiological and sociodemographic characteristics of the asymptomatic carriers that have been reported, and to review the strategies used for the potential diagnosis and control of transmissibility at the family and community level.

METHODS

A systematic review approach was used. This, under the premise of including rationalized efforts to identify, organize/map and synthesize the findings ¹³^,¹⁴. As a first measure, a process was carried out of translation into the documentary language and identification of a standard question format that responded to the information needs that guided this review. Consequently, the following questions were constructed: What are the epidemiological and demographic characteristics of people diagnosed with COVID-19 who remain asymptomatic during all the disease? What are the best strategies for diagnosis, prevention and control of the transmissibility of COVID-19 by asymptomatic people?

Eligibility criteria

Eligibility criteria inclusion were considered all studies published from January 1 to June 26,2020, conducted in humans, who remained asymptomatic throughout the clinical course of COVID-19. We searched for registries without methodological or language restrictions, the results of which focused on the clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of this population and/or the diagnostic or prevention and control strategies used to identify and reduce transmissibility. Records whose documentary type corresponded to letters to the editor, abstracts, editorials or errata faith were excluded.

Information sources

We considered some descriptors can be seen in table 1. These descriptors configured search equations adapted to next bibliographic databases (BDB): PubMed, Ovid, Scielo , Ebsco, Scopus, LILACS, Epistemonikos and Embase. Additionally, technical documents and reverse search in selected articles were considered (Table 1).

Table 1 Example of search equation, according to bibliographic databases

Bibliographic database	Search equation
PubMed	((((((asymptomatic[Title/Abstract]) OR “asymptomatic transmission”[Title/Abstract]) OR “Carrier State”[Title/Abstract]) OR “healthy carriers”[Title/Abstract])) AND ((“COVID-19”[Title/ Abstract]) OR “SARS-CoV2”[Title/Abstract])) AND diagnosis [Title/Abstract]

Source: Own construction of the team of researchers.

Study selection

Four reviewers with postgraduate training in epidemiology and public health participated in this review. Through the application for the screening stage ¹⁵, peer re-viewers (jm, ca, fp) independently assessed the titles and summaries of the searches, depending on whether the included findings were relevant to the two objectives put forward. In the records without agreement, a third (sm) reviewer settled the conflicts. Upon passing the screening phase, in the eligibility stage a full-text records eligibility matrix was designed in excel to identify the articles to be evaluated in full text, selecting the records that had all the inclusion criteria considered in the review and the components of the guiding questions. This matrix was in-dependently completed for four groups of articles, one for each reviewer, and subsequently validated by consensus by all reviewers. Finally, when assessing the risk of bias of the selected studies, the articles that were subject to data extraction were included.

Data item and collection process

In consensus, the reviewers designed and piloted an information extraction matrix (excel) consisting of four fields.

Risk of bias in individual studies

Five criteria to establish the risk of bias were identified and weighed: absence of bias in the selection of participants, quality of the data record, absence of conflicts of interest or clear reporting of funding sources, absence of publication bias, and compliance with criteria of content and/or structure of the manuscript. The totality of articles selected for data extraction was divided into two groups, each of which was assigned to two pairs of reviewers, who independently rated each record and agreed the articles that ultimately formed part of the synthesis of findings of this review. The consistency of this stage was evaluated by the reviewers who have clinical and epidemiological experience.

RESULTS

Study selection

The literature search for this literature review included the different electronic BDBS reported in the methodology session. The search ran from January first to June 26-2020. It was carried out in various stages as shown in figure 1. In the identification stage, the keywords shown in table 1 were used, and a total of 1 874 articles were found.

Figure 1 Flow chart of the different phases of the systematic review

Of these, 523 were eliminated in duplicates, leaving 1 351, which passed to the screening stage. They underwent a review of titles and summary by pairs and resolution of conflicts by a third reviewer, finding 20 duplicates and discarding 1.128 more that did not meet the inclusion criteria. At the end of this phase, 203 articles remained.

In the next stage, a full-text peer review was performed, 128 did not meet inclusion criteria, five were duplicates, two were not retrieved by language, and nine were excluded because they corresponded to research proto-cols. At the end of this phase, 59 articles remained, which went to the inclusion stage for quantitative synthesis and extraction of specific information. Researchers peer-re-viewed the full texts of records deemed eligible for inclusion; any discrepancies were resolved through discussion and consensus. In this phase, 1 duplicated and 8 with low methodological quality and high risk of bias were excluded, therefore leaving 50 articles (Figure 1).

Study characteristics

The vast majority of studies ³⁷ were case studies and case series, one was a cross-sectional study, seven cohort studies (mostly retrospective) and five were systematic reviews (two with meta-analyses). They were published in indexed journals with high academic impact, with participants and researchers from countries such as China (n=25), the USA (n=6), Japan (n=3), Italy (n=3), and South Korea (n=3).

Synthesis of results

As described in the methodology, it was reviewed and verified that in the reviewed articles, asymptomatic people did not become symptomatic during the follow-up period. Of the 50 articles included, all showed at the end persons who fulfilled this characteristic; on average, the articles showed 73 participants, ranging from one to 878 participants. However, two-thirds of the studies had up to 50 participants. Regarding the sex of the participants, 39 of the articles reported both sexes, four reported only women, seven reported only men, and one did not report this variable. Regarding the population, about 23/50 of the articles reported adult population, thirteen reported a mixed population (adult and pediatric), eleven pediatric populations, three in pregnant women.

Six studies reported a history of diabetes, and seven reported hypertension history. Regarding the epidemiological designs that supported these studies, 28/50 studies selected were case series, five were systematic reviews, seven were cohort designs, and the rest were cross-sectional studies. The information gathering techniques were mostly through electronic clinical records, four reported face-to-face interviews. Most of the studies carried out descriptive analysis, that is, they presented reports with absolute and relative frequencies; few studies presented comparative analysis and/or bivariate tests or with statistical significance processes. In terms of prevention measures to avoid contagions, as individual measures, most of the studies do not mention the use of masks, three of the studies do mention it. Only three studies made mention of promoting healthy lifestyles. 13 studies shown basic supportive treatment and antivirals were administered to asymptomatic patients, the rest were not given treatment, they were only under observation. In 20 studies, they mention the identification of close contacts and testing (RT-PCR), and the follow-up of the contacts by telephone calls. In 22 studies, they mentioned the compulsory social isolation of asymptomatic (Table 2).

Table 2 Summary of studies included in the systematic review

Authors	Countries	Population and participants	Sex	Age (range or average)	No. Part*	Study design	Co-morbidities	Main control and prevention measures
Lan, L.; et.al.¹⁶	China	Children	Females/ Males(F/M)	7 - 13 years old (y-o)	4	Case series (CS)	Non reported (NR)	Hospital isolation. Follow-up to close contacts and taking second test after 15 days.
Bai, K.; et.al.¹⁷	China	Children	F/M	11 y-o	8	CS	NR	Pharmacological treatment with interferon/ribavirin
Lee, Y.H.; et.al.¹⁸	South Korea-SK	Both	F/M	40,6 y-o	371	CS	Diabetes Mellitus (DM), High Blood Pressure (HBP) and Obesity	Preventive Isolation-PI, second test taken after 15 days. To declare a patient's recovery, two consecutive negative tests in 24 hours.
Lombardi, A; et.al.¹⁹	Italy	Adults	F/M	44,5 y-o	17	CS	NR	PI, identification of close contacts and testing**
Kronbichler, A; et.al.²⁰	Austria	Both	F/M	31 y-o	506	SR-MA	NR	PI and monitoring of patients.
Khoury, R; et.al.²¹	USA	Pregnancies	F	18 - 47 y-o	102	Prospective cohort study- PCS	NR	Use of mask, PI and identification of close contacts and testing**
Patel, et.al.²²	USA	Adults	F	82 y-o	13	Retrospective cohort study- RCS	NR	Use of mask, PI, second test and identification of close contacts and test**
Liu, Z.; et.al.²³	China	Adults	F/M	40 y-o	131	PCS	NR	Identification of close contacts and testing** after 14 days.
Tabata, S.; et.al.²⁴	Japan	Adults	F/M	45 - 75 y-o	33	Retrospective and descriptive study-RDS	DM and HBP	NR
Du, H.; et.al.²⁵	China	Children	F/M	6 y-o	24	RCS	NR	Identification of close contacts and testing** after 14 days. Isolation in hospital
Zhang, L; et.al.²⁶	China	Children	F/M	1 day to 17,5 y-o	117	SR-MA	NR	Carrying out of the test **after 14 days. Pharmacological treatment with interferon.
Alsofayan; Y.M.; et.al. ²⁷	Saudi Arabi	Both	F/M	36 y-o	142	RDS	DM and HBP	PI.
Parri, N.; et.al.²⁸	Italy	Children	F/M	6 y-o	17	CS	NR	NR
Wang, Y.; et.al-²⁹	China	Both	F/M	39,3 y-o	63	RDS	DM and HBP	Pharmacological treatment with some oral antiviral with inhalation of interferon. To declare the recover y of a patient, two consecutive negative tests in 24 hours and a chest tomography with normal findings.
Zhen-Dong,Y.; et,al. ³⁰	China	Children	F/M	7 y-o	77	Sistematic review-SR	NR	NR
Song, W.³¹	China	Children	F/M	11,5 months to 14 years	8	CS	NR	Second test**, symptomatic treatment, antipyretics, antivirals, traditional Chinese medicine. Follow-up to hospitalized patients.
Zhu, J.; et.al.³²	China	Both	F/M	21 - 56 y-o	878	SR-MA	NR	Identification of close contacts, monitoring and PI.

Wang; L.; et.al.³³	China	Adults	M	54 and 55 y-o	2	CS	NR	Second test**, quadruple treatment, antivirals. Follow-up to hospitalized patients.

Rivett; et.al. ³⁴	United Kingdom-UK	Adults	F/M	34 y-o	17	CS	NR	Second Test, telephone monitoring, identification of close contacts and testing
Ujjan, I.; et.al.³⁵	Pakistan	Adults	F/M	57,8 y-o	343	CS	NR	Second test**, follow-up of hospitalized patients and PI.
Chau, N.V.V.; et.al. ³⁶	Vietnam	Adults	F/M	30 y-o	13	CS	NR	Second test**, education, in healthy lifestyles, telephone monitoring and PI.
London, V. et.al.³⁷	USA	Pregnancies	F	30,5 y-o	22	RCS	NR	Second test** and education in healthy lifestyles.
Uechi, T.³⁸	Japan	Adults	F	64 y-o	1	CS	HBP	Test** control and PI.
Wu, J.³⁹	China	Adults	F/M	47,5 y-o	9	CS	NR	Tests and identification of close contacts and test
Jones, N.K.; et.al.⁴⁰	UK	Adults	F/M	36,5 y-o	8	RDS	NR	PI.
Fusco, F.M.; et.al.⁴¹	Italy	Adults	F/M	43 y-o	3	Cross sectional study-CSS	NR	Use of mask and second test** 6-7 days after the first.
Cheung, Z.B.⁴²	USA	Adults	F/M	67 - 90 y-o	8	RCS	DM and HBP	Pharmacological treatment with azithromycin, hydroxy-chloroquine, supplemental oxygen.
Wan, R.; et.al.⁴³	China	Adults	F/M	36 - 45 y-o	2	CS	NR	Use of masks between 14 and 25 days. Pharmacological treatment.
Arons, M.M.; et.al. ⁴⁴	USA	Adults	NR	78,6 y-o	3	CSS	NR	NR
Jiang, X.L.⁴⁵	China	Both	F	0 - 53 y-o	2	CS	NR	PI. Phylogenetic analysis of surface samples such as rooms, kitchens and bath-rooms.
Castaganoli, R.; et.al. ⁴⁶	China	Children	M	10 - 19 y-o	3	SR	NR	NR
Meng, H. et.al.⁴⁷	China	Adults	F/M	40 y-o	22	RDS	DM and HBP	NR
Tan, Y.P.; et.al.⁴⁸	China	Children	F/M	6 months	2	RDS	NR	Hospital isolation.
Albano, D.; et.al.⁴⁹	Italy	Adults	F/M	64,5 y-o	5	PCS	Cancer	Three patients with PI for two weeks with daily temperature measurement. Two patients received pharmacological treatment.
Ji, t.; et.al. ⁵⁰	China	Both	F/M	49 y-o	50	CS	NR	Follow-up, second test taken after two weeks and identification of close contacts.
Samsami, M.; et.al. ⁵¹	Iran	Adults	F/M	49,7 y-o	6	CS	NR	NR
Lu; S.⁵²	China	Adults	F/M	No report	3	CS	NR	Use of mask for one week, at the end of the control test**. Pharmacological treatment.
Qian, G.; et.al. ⁵³	China	Both	F/M	13 months - 60 y-o	2	CS	NR	Control test after 15 days, identification of close contacts and testing and PI.
Tian, S.; et.al.⁵⁴	China	Both	F/M	47,5 y-o	13	CS	NR	Identification of close contacts and testing** and PI.
Hu, Z.; et.al.⁵⁵	China	Both	F/M	14 y-o	19	CS	DM and HBP	Negative control test** up to 28 days. Education in healthy lifestyles. Identification of close contacts, testing and PI.
Du, W.; et.al. ⁵⁶	China	Children	F/M	41,4 y-o	8	CS	NR	All the patients were in a hospital environment, so no specific control measures.
Park,S.J.; et.al.⁵⁷	SK	Adults	NR	38 y-o	4	CS	NR	Control test** after 14 days, identification of close contacts, testing, telephone monitoring of close contacts and PI.
Luo, L.; et.al.⁵⁸	China	Both	F/M	37 y-o	5	v	NR	Identification of close contacts and testing** and PI. All the contacts were in a hospital environment, so no specific control measures.
Mizumoto, K.; et.al. ⁵⁹	Japan	Both	F/M	0 - 90 years old	328	CS	NR	Identification of close contacts, testing and PI.
Dong, Y.; et.al.⁶⁰	China	Children	F/M	7 y-o	94	CS	NR	Identification of close contacts and testing **and PI.
Ki, M.⁶¹	SK	Both	F/M	42 y-o	3	CS	NR	Use of mask for two weeks. Identification of close contacts, testing** and PI.
Dong, X.; et.al.⁶²	China	Adults	M	26 y-o	¹	CS	NR	Control Test after 14 days, identification of close contacts and testing and PI.
Danis, K.; et.al.⁶³	France	Adults	M	NR	1	CS	NR	NR
Breslin, N.; et.al.⁶⁴	USA	Pregnancies	F	29,7 y-o	7	CS	Obesity	Use of mask for two weeks. Control test. Identification of close contacts, telephone monitoring and testing
Yongchen, Z.; et.al. ⁶⁵	China	Both	F/M	25 y-o	5	CS	NR	Control test**.

* Number of participants;** Refers to (SARS-CoV2-RT-PCR).Source: Own construction of the team of researchers.

DISCUSSION

3 525 asymptomatic people were identified in this study (average 37,1 years old; age range: 0,5 to 82 years old). No mortality was reported. Except for one study that used serological tests ³⁹, diagnosis in asymptomatic patients was made with positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (SARS-COV2-RT-PCR) tests. Similarly, recovery was determined in most studies with one or two consecutive RT-PCR tests with negative results and normal chest tomography patterns. Positive control tests were observed after 7 to 24 days, with respect to the confirmatory diagnostic test.

Medical history of asymptomatic people diagnosed with COVID-19, less than 20% of the studies reported comorbidities such as high blood pressure, diabetes mellitus or obesity. An important group reported tomographic alterations presumptive of pneumonia, without symptoms and/or alterations evidenced by chest X-rays. The tomographic alterations coincide with that reported by some authors ⁶⁶ who found that in 36 patients, of 4 studies in which the results of the chest tomography were available, 15 (41,7%) had abnormal findings with bilateral involvement and 14 (38,9%) unilateral.

Compared to the findings in immunological or blood chemistry tests, increased values of C-reactive protein, lactic dehydrogenase were evidenced; and lymphopenia or leukocytopenia; which is consistent with the findings of other researchers ¹⁷^,⁶.

Although this review does not report results related to the effectiveness of the control measures, isolation and follow-up of cases and close contacts, there are diverse experiences and literature that records that where these measures have been applied, has led to a decrease in the transmission of the infectious agent within the susceptible population. Its non-application in a systematic and timely manner has shown the risks and consequences in the elderly and in people with comorbidities, as happened in the United States, Brazil, Mexico, India or Colombia.

On the contrary, its application in a continuous, systematic, early, and generalized way, even in densely populated countries such as Vietnam or Taiwan, has caused the transmission speed to decrease due to the detection and isolation of cases and contacts, and therefore the risks of transmission, morbidity and death have been reduced, as has also occurred in other countries such as Canada, New Zealand and some European countries ⁶⁷^-⁷⁰.

Evidence also shows that, in asymptomatic patients, the viral load is similar to that of symptomatic patients. If these asymptomatic patients are not diagnosed, are not isolated, protection measures are not taken, they can potentially infect other people, so it is suggested to carry out tests that allow the detection of asymptomatic cases, to improve the strategies for control of COViD-19⁷^,⁵³.

Limitations in the body of evidence

The studies selected in this review had several limitations. Many had a small sample size: 33 of 50 studies had between 1 and 20 participants, limited by the representativeness of the results presented. Additionally, the studies carried out in pregnant women had limitations related to the nonspecific reporting of findings in paraclinical tests and symptoms that could well be related to COVID-19 or infectious pathologies typical of pregnancy.

On the other hand, thirty of the fifty articles were case series, where most of them had basically descriptive analysis. Consequently, the measures and the results reports were heterogeneous, which limited the performance of a meta-analysis process of the information extracted.

Limitations of the review

The COVID-19 pandemic has represented a challenge for humanity, which has sought to seek alternatives for the prevention, control, mitigation and eradication of the disease. This has led to an 'explosion' of information from different parts of the world, which seeks to describe or propose alternatives for action in the face of the pandemic. Much of this information has a risk of bias or limitations of external validity, related to the availability of health technologies or the configuration of the health systems and services of the countries where the studies were carried out.

As a limitation of this study, a group of records was divided and screened by each of the reviewers independently. However, in order to overcome the risk of bias, in the eligibility and extraction phase, peer review and group consensus of the articles individually selected by the reviewers were favored.

Additionally, due to the fact that studies whose target population was asymptomatic were privileged, it led to the consolidated information having a high degree of heterogeneity, as stated previously, consequently, the possibility of analyzing aspects such as the basic reproduction of vi-ruses, the mean incubation time, infection rate, seroprevalence, and case fatality rate for COVID-19 in asymptomatic people; as happened with the study of certain researchers ⁷¹ who obtained such information from a group of studies that analyzed these aspects, but were directed to the symptomatic and asymptomatic population. On the other hand, this evidence synthesis did not report findings on the fecal-oral transmission ⁷² of the virus or on the average recovery time in the population object of this review. Nor did it identify the viral load of asymptomatic patients ⁷³, nor how it was previously reported. Other variables of community transmission of COVID-19 were specifically recorded, such as screening strategies ⁷⁴ and tracking strategies for this population ⁷⁵ ♠

REFERENCES

1. Last J, Spasoff R, Harris S, eds. A Dictionary of Epidemiology. 4th. ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000. [ Links ]

2. León G. Dinámica de transmisión de la enfermedad. In: Celentano D, Szklo M, editors. Gordis Epidemiología. 6th. Barcelona, España: Elsevier; 2019. p. 17-41. [ Links ]

3. Chang H, Glass R. Fiebre tifoidea. JAMA; 2009. [ Links ]

4. Prieto L, Gorgolás M. Mary 'la tifoidea', la mujer que mató a tres personas sin salir de la cocina. El País [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Jul 27]. https://bit.ly/2YDadao . [ Links ]

5. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. The Lancet.2020; 395(10223):497-506. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5. [ Links ]

6. Li Q, Guan X, Wu P, Wang X, Zhou L, Tong Y, et al. Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382(13):1199-207. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001316. [ Links ]

7. Zou L, Ruan F, Huang M, Liang L, Huang H, Hong Z, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Viral Load in Upper Respiratory Specimens of Infected Patients. N Engl J Med . 2020; 382(12):1177-9. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2001737. [ Links ]

8. Bogoch II, Watts A, Thomas-Bachli A, Huber C, Kraemer MUG, Khan K, et al. Pneumonia of unknown aetiology in Wuhan, China: potential for international spread via commercial air travel. J Travel Med.2020; 27(2):1-3. DOI: 10.1093/jtm/taaa008. [ Links ]

9. Rothe C, Schunk M, Sothmann P, Bretzel G, Froeschl G, Wallrauch C, et al. Transmission of 2019-nCoV Infection from an Asymptomatic Con-tact in Germany. N Engl J Med . 2020; 382(10):970-1. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2001468. [ Links ]

10. Mason RJ. Pathogenesis of COVID-19 from a cell biologic perspective. Eur Respir J. 2020; 55(4). DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00607-2020. [ Links ]

11. Lai C-C, Liu Y-H, Wang C-Y, Wang Y-H, Hsueh S-C, Yen M-Y, et al. Asymptomatic carrier state, acute respiratory disease, and pneumonia due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2): Facts and myths. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2020; 53(3):404-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmii.2020.02.012. [ Links ]

12. Choe P, Kang C, Suh H, Jung J, Kang E, Lee S, et al. Antibody Responses to SARS-CoV-2 at 8 Weeks Postinfection in Asymptomatic Patients. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020; 26(10):2484-7. DOI: 10.3201/eid2610.202211. [ Links ]

13. Oliver S, Wilson M, Melendez-Torres G. How can we select review methods for complex questions related to health policy and system improvement? In: Tricco A, Straus S, Langlois E, editors. Rapid reviews to strengthen health policy and systems: a practical guide [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2017. https://bit.ly/3tpE8AY. [ Links ]

14. Tricco A, Straus S, Langlois E, eds. Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research. Rapid reviews to strengthen health policy and systems: a practical guide. Geneva: World Health Organization ; 2017. [ Links ]

15. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016; 5(210):1-10. [ Links ]

16. Lan L, Xu D, Xia C, Wang S, Yu M, Xu H, et al. Early CT Findings of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Asymptomatic Children: A Single-Center Experience. Korean J Radiol. 2020; 21(7):919-24. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2020.0231. [ Links ]

17. Bai K, Liu W, Liu C, Fu Y, Hu J, Qin Y, et al. Clinical Analysis of 25 COVID-19 Infections in Children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2020; 39(7):100-3. DOI: 10.1097/INF.0000000000002740. [ Links ]

18. Lee Y, Hong C, Kim D, Lee T, Lee J. Clinical Course of Asymptomatic and Mildly Symptomatic Patients with Coronavirus Disease Admitted to Community Treatment Centers, South Korea. Emerg Infect Dis . 2020; 26(10):2346-52. DOI: 10.3201/eid2610.201620. [ Links ]

19. Lombardi A, Consonni D, Carungo M, Bandera A, Lunghi G, Gori A. Characteristics of 1573 healthcare workers who underwent nasopharyngeal swab for SARS-CoV-2 in Milan, Lombardy, Italy. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020; 26(10):1413-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.06.013. [ Links ]

20. Kronbichler A, Kresse D, Yoon S, Lee K, Effenberger A, Shin J. Asymptomatic patients as a source of COVID-19 infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Infect Dis. 2020; 98(2020):180-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.06.052. [ Links ]

21. Khoury R, Bernstein P, Debolt C, Stone J, Sutton DM, Simpson L, et al. Characteristics and Outcomes of 241 Births to Women with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Infection at Five New York City Medical Centers. Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 136(2):273-82. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004025. [ Links ]

22. Patel M, Chaisson L, Borgetti S, Burdsall D, Chugh RK, Hoff CR, et al. Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 mortality during an outbreak investigation in a skilled nursing facility. Clin Infect Dis. 2020. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa763. [ Links ]

23. Liu Z, Chu R, Gong L, Su B, Wu J. The assessment of transmission efficiency and latent infection period on asymptomatic carriers of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Int J Infect Dis . 2020; 99(2020):325-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.06.036. [ Links ]

24. Tabata S, Imai K, Kawano S, Ikeda M, Kodama T, Miyoshi K, et al. Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 in 104 people with SARS-CoV-2 infection on the Diamond Princess cruise ship: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020; 20(9):1043-50. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30482-5. [ Links ]

25. Du H, Dong X, Zhang J-J, Cao Y-Y, Akdis M, Huang P-Q, et al. Clinical characteristics of 182 pediatric COVID-19 patients with different seve-rities and allergic status. Allergy. 2020:1-2. DOI: 10.1111/all.14452. [ Links ]

26. Zhang L, Peres T, Silva M, Camargos P. What we know so far about Coronavirus Disease 2019 in children: A meta-analysis of 551 laboratory-confirmed cases. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020; 55(8):2115-27. DOI: 10.1002/ppul.24869. [ Links ]

27. Alsofayan Y, Althunayyan S, Khan A, Hakawi A, Assiri A. Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia: A national retrospective study. J Infect Public Health. 2020; 13(7):920-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.05.026. [ Links ]

28. Parri N, Magistà AM, Marchetti F, Cantoni B, Arrighini A, Romanengo M, et al. Characteristic of COVID-19 infection in pediatric patients: early findings from two Italian Pediatric Research Networks. Eur J Pediatr. 2020; 179(8):1315-23. DOI: 10.1007/s00431-020-03683-8. [ Links ]

29. Wang Y, Tong J, Qin Y, Xie T, Li J, Li J, et al. Characterization of an asymptomatic cohort of SARS-COV-2 infected individuals outside of Wuhan, China. Clin Infect Dis . DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa629. [ Links ]

30. Zhen-Dong Y, Gao-Jun Z, Run-Ming J, Zhi-Sheng L, Zong-Qi D, Xiong X, et al. Clinical and transmission dynamics characteristics of 406 children with coronavirus disease 2019 in China: A review. J Infect. 2020; 81(2):11-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.04.030. [ Links ]

31. Song W, Li J, Zou N, Guan W, Pan J, Xu W, et al. Clinical features of pediatric patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19). J Clin Virol. 2020; 127:6037-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104377. [ Links ]

32. Zhu J, Zhong Z, Ji P, Li H, Li B, Pang J, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics of 8697 patients with COVID-19 in China: a meta-analysis. Fam Med Community Health.2020; 8(2):1-11. [ Links ]

33. Wang L, Xu X, Ruan J, Lin S, Jiang J, Ye H. Quadruple therapy for asymptomatic COVID-19 infection patients. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2020; 18(7):617-24. [ Links ]

34. Rivett L, Sridhar S, Sparkes D, Routledge M, Jones NK, Forrest S, et al. Screening of healthcare workers for SARS-CoV-2 highlights the role of asymptomatic carriage in COVID-19 transmission. eLife. 2020. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.58728. [ Links ]

35. Ujjan I, Devrajani B, Ghanghro A, Shah S. The clinical and demographical profile of Coronavirus illness: The tale of Tablighi Jamaat and Zaireen in Quarantine / Isolation center at Sukkur and Hyderabad. Pak J Med Sci. 2020; 36(4):12-6. DOI: 10.12669/pjms.36.COVID19-S4.2829. [ Links ]

36. Chau N, Thanh V, Thanh N, Yen L, Minh N, Hung L, et al. The natural history and transmission potential of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Clin Infect Dis . 2020. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa711. [ Links ]

37. London V, McLaren R, Atallah F, Cepeda C, McCalla S, Fisher N, et al. The Relationship between Status at Presentation and Outcomes among Pregnant Women with COVID-19. Am J Perinatol. 2020. 37(10):991-4. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1712164. [ Links ]

38. Uechi T, Nakamura S, Takeshita R, Morino K, Mizuno R, Nakagawa Y, et al. Persistence of positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction test result for 24 days in a hospitalized asymptomatic carrier. Acute Med Surg. 2020; 7(1):1-4. DOI: 10.1002/ams2.525. [ Links ]

39. Wu J, Liu X, Zhou D, Qiu G, Dai M, Yang Q, et al. Identification of RT-PCR-Negative Asymptomatic COVID-19 Patients via Serological Testing. Front Public Health. 2020; 8(267):1-5. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00267. [ Links ]

40. Jones NK, Rivett L, Sparkes D, Forrest S, Sridhar S, Young J, et al. Effective control of SARS-CoV-2 transmission between healthcare workers during a period of diminished community prevalence of COVID 19. eLife. 2020. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.59391. [ Links ]

41. Fusco F, Pisaturo M, Iodice V, Bellopede R, Tambaro O, Parrella G, et al. COVID-19 among Healthcare Workers in an Infectious Diseases specialized setting in Naples, Southern Italy: results of a cross-sectional surveillance study. J Hosp Infect. 2020; 105(4):596-600. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.06.021. [ Links ]

42. Cheung ZB, Forsh DA. Early outcomes after hip fracture surgery in COVID-19 patients in New York City. J Orthop. 2020; 21(1):291-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.06.003. [ Links ]

43. Wan R, Mao Z-Q, He L-Y, Hu Y-C, Wei-Chen. Evidence from two cases of asymptomatic infection with SARS-CoV-2: Are 14 days of isolation sufficient? Int J Infect Dis . 2020; 95(2020):174-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.03.041. [ Links ]

44. Arons MM, Hatfield KM, Reddy SC, Kimball A, James A, Jacobs JR, et al. Presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infections and Transmission in a Skilled Nursing Facility. N Engl J Med . 2020; 382(22):2081-90. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2008457. [ Links ]

45. Jiang X-L, Zhang X-L, Zhao X-N, Li C-B, Lei J, Kou Z-Q, et al. Trans-mission potential of asymptomatic and paucisymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections: a three-family cluster study in China. J Infect Dis. 2020; 221(12):1948-52. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa206. [ Links ]

46. Castagnoli R, Votto M, Licari A, Brambilla I, Bruno R, Perlini S, et al. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Infection in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review. JAMA Pediatr. 2020; 174(9):882-9. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.1467. [ Links ]

47. Meng H, Xiong R, He R, Lin W, Hao B, Zhang L, et al. CT imaging and clinical course of asymptomatic cases with COVID-19 pneumonia at admission in Wuhan, China. J Infect . 2020; 81(1):33-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.04.004. [ Links ]

48. Tan Y-P, Tan B-Y, Pan J, Wu J, Zeng S-Z, Wei H-Y. Epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of 10 children with coronavirus disease 2019 in Changsha, China. J Clin Virol . 2020; 127(2020):1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104353. [ Links ]

49. Albano D, Bertagna F, Bertolia M, Bosio G, Lucchini S, Motta F, et al. Incidental findings suggestive of covid-19 in asymptomatic patients undergoing nuclear medicine procedures in a high prevalence region. J Nucl Med. 2020; 61(5):632-6. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.246256. [ Links ]

50. Ji T, Chen H-L, Xu J, Wu L-N, Li J, Chen K, et al. Lockdown contained the spread of 2019 novel coronavirus disease in Huangshi city, China: Early epidemiological findings. Clin Infect Dis . 2020; 71(6):1454-60. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa390. [ Links ]

51. Samsami M, Zebarjadi Bagherpour J, Nematihonar B, Tahmasbi H. COVID-19 Pneumonia in Asymptomatic Trauma Patients; Report of 8 Cases. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2020; 8(1):46-9. [ Links ]

52. Lu S, Lin J, Zhang Z, Xiao L, Jiang Z, Chen J, et al. Alert for non-respiratory symptoms of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients in epidemic period: A case report of familial cluster with three asymptomatic COVID-19 patients. J Med Virol. 2020. DOI: 10.1002/jmv.25776. [ Links ]

53. Qian G, Yang N, Ma A, Wang L, Li G, Chen X, et al. A COVID-19 Trans-mission within a family cluster by presymptomatic infectors in China. Clin Infect Dis . 2020; 71(15):861-2. [ Links ]

54. Tian S, Hu N, Lou J, Chen K, Kang X, Xiang Z, et al. Characteristics of COVID-19 infection in Beijing. J Infect . 2020; 80(4):401-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.02.018. [ Links ]

55. Hu Z, Song C, Xu C, Jin G, Chen Y, Xu X, et al. Clinical characteristics of 24 asymptomatic infections with COVID-19 screened among close contacts in Nanjing, China. Sci China Life Sci. 2020; 63(5):706-11. DOI: 10.1007/s11427-020-1661-4. [ Links ]

56. Du W, Yu J, Wang H, Zhang X, Zhang S, Li Q, et al. Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 in children compared with adults in Shandong Province, China. Infection. 2020; 48(3):445-52. DOI: 10.1007/s15010-020-01427-2. [ Links ]

57. Park S, Kim Y, Yi S, Lee S, Na B, Kim C, et al. Coronavirus Disease Outbreak in Call Center, South Korea. Emerg Infect Dis . 2020; 26(8):1666-70. DOI: 10.3201/eid2608.201274. [ Links ]

58. Luo Y, Trevathan E, Qian Z, Li Y, Li J, Xiao W, et al. Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Household Contacts of a Healthcare Provider, Wuhan, China. Emerg Infect Dis . 2020; 26(8):1930-3. DOI: 10.3201/eid2608.201016. [ Links ]

59. Mizumoto K, Kagaya K, Zarebski A, Chowell G. Estimating the asymptomatic proportion of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases on board the Diamond Princess cruise ship, Yokohama, Japan, 2020. Euro Surveill. 2020; 25(22):10-4. DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.10.2000180. [ Links ]

60. Dong Y, Mo X, Hu Y, Qi X, Jiang F, Jiang Z, et al. Epidemiology of COVID-19. Among Children in China. Pediatrics. 2020; 145(6):1-12. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2020-0702. [ Links ]

61. Ki M, Task Force for 2019-nCoV. Epidemiologic characteristics of early cases with 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) disease in Korea. Epidemiol Health. 2020. DOI: 10.4178/epih.e2020007. [ Links ]

62. Dong X, Cao Y, Lu X, Zhang J, Du H, Yan Y, et al. Eleven faces of coronavirus disease 2019. Allergy. 2020; 75(7):1699-709. DOI: 10.1111/all.14289. [ Links ]

63. Danis K, Epaulard O, Benet T, Gaymard A, Campoy S, Bothelo-Nevers E, et al. Cluster of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the French Alps, 2020. Clin Infect Dis . 2020; 71(15):825-32. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa424. [ Links ]

64. Breslin N, Baptiste C, Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Miller R, Martinez R, Bernstein K, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 infection among asymptomatic and symptomatic pregnant women: two weeks of confirmed presentations to an affiliated pair of New York City hospitals. Am J Obstet Gynecol . 2020; 2(2):1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100118. [ Links ]

65. Yongchen Z, Shen H, Wang X, Shi X, Li Y, Yan J, et al. Different longitudinal patterns of nucleic acid and serology testing results based on disease severity of COVID-19 patients. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020; 9(1):833-6. DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1756699. [ Links ]

66. He J, Guo Y, Mao R, Zhang J. Proportion of asymptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Virol . 2020. DOI: 10.1002/jmv.26326. [ Links ]

67. Hellewell J, Abbott S, Gimma A, Bosse N, Jarvis C, Russell T, et al. Feasibility of controlling COVID-19 outbreaks by isolation of cases and contacts. Lancet Glob Health. 2020; 8(4):488-96. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30074-7. [ Links ]

68. Kucharski AJ, Klepac P, Conlan AJK, Kissler SM, Tang ML, Fry H, et al. Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing, and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings: a mathematical modelling study. Lancet Infect Dis . 2020; 20(10):1151-60. [ Links ]

69. Salathé M, Althaus CL, Neher R, Stringhini S, Hodcroft E, Fellay J, et al. COVID-19 epidemic in Switzerland: on the importance of testing, contact tracing and isolation. Swiss Med Wkly. 2020. DOI: 10.4414/smw.2020.20225. [ Links ]

70. World Health Organization. Contact tracing in the context of COVID 19 [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2020 [cited 2020 Jul 26]. https://bit.ly/2MW1gXi . [ Links ]

71. He W, Yi GY, Zhu Y. Estimation of the basic reproduction number, ave-rage incubation time, asymptomatic infection rate, and case fatality rate for COVID-19: Meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis. J Med Virol . 2020; 2543-50. DOI: 10.1002/jmv.26041. [ Links ]

72. Al-Sadeq DW, Nasrallah GK. The incidence of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 among asymptomatic patients: a systematic review. Int J Infect Dis . 2020; 98:372-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.06.098. [ Links ]

73. Yan X, Han X, Fan Y, Fang Z, Long D, Zhu Y. Duration of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA in asymptomatic carriers. Crit Care Lond Engl. 2020; 24(1):245-7. [ Links ]

74. Al-Shamsi H, Coomes E, Alrawi S. Screening for COVID-19 in Asymptomatic Patients with Cancer in a Hospital in the United Arab Emirates. JAMA Oncol. 2020; 6(10):1627-8. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.2548. [ Links ]

75. Hanalise V, Singh A. Asymptomatic transmission during the COVID 19 pandemic and implications for public health strategies. Clin Infect Dis . 2020. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa654. [ Links ]

Funding: This research did not receive any specific.

Conflict of interest: None.

Received: October 26, 2020; Revised: October 29, 2020; Accepted: November 10, 2020

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License