SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue36CHEMICAL STANDPOINT ABOUT DETERIORATION AND BIODETERIORATION OF CALCAREOUS ROCKS THAT MAKE PART OF CULTURAL HERITAGE MONUMENTSCONTEMPORARY DEBATES ABOUT TERRITORIAL PLANNING AND LOCAL MANAGEMENT author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Luna Azul

Print version ISSN 1909-2474

Abstract

GRAJALES-QUINTERO, ALBERTO; SERRANO-MOYA, EDGAR D.  and  HAHN VON-H, CHRISTINE M.. MULTICRITERIA METHODS AND PROCESSES FOR ASSESSMENT. Luna Azul [online]. 2013, n.36, pp.285-306. ISSN 1909-2474.

This article aims to make clear the benefits the multicriteria-method gives to scientific assessment which are consistent with a rationality framework. It begins by referring to the scientific method, through which humankind tries to understand the world building an artificial world from science. Afterwards a reflection on the added value qualitative methods as a methodology can give, is presented since they allow a broader worldview by taking into account variables that cannot be expressed quantitatively. Finally, a multicriteria-method is presented as a useful tool to determine the impact of actions on sustainability, while incorporating the existing conflicts between economic, environmental and social objectives, and between different levels of decision making in scientific assessment.

Keywords : Scientific method; qualitative methods; multicriteria method.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )