SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.13 issue1Content and composition of essential oil in lemon balm (Lippia alba (Mill) N.E.Br.) grown with ammonium and nitrate in light environments author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas

Print version ISSN 2011-2173

rev.colomb.cienc.hortic. vol.13 no.1 Bogotá Jan./Apr. 2019

https://doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2019vl3il.8067 

Scientific notes

Effect of cuttings defoliation and different substrates on the vegetative propagation of the monkey-pepper (Piper aduncum L.) (Piperaceae)

Efecto de la defoliación de esquejes y diferentes substratos en la propagación vegetativa de pimienta de mono (Piper aduncum L.) (Piperaceae)

AUREA PORTES FERRIANI1  * 

DIONES KRINSKI2 

1Universidad Federal del Paraná, Department of Agronomy, Curitiba (Brazil). ORCID : 0000-0002-28966427

2Universidad do Estado de Mato Grosso, Campus Eugênio Carlos Stieler, Tangara da Serra (Brazil). ORCID : 0000-0002-4719-5314


ABSTRACT

Forests constitute a valuable natural resource, especially when including non-timber forest products (NTFPs). Bioprospecting for and sustainable exploration of native species and the development of protocols for seedling production promote conservation. Piper aduncum L. stands out in several regions of Brazil because of several biological activities, notably action as a repellent, antimicrobial and insecticide. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of defoliation and different substrates on the cutting process. For this, an experiment was conducted in February, 2016 at the Health Plant Department, Sector of Agricultural Sciences, Federal University of Paraná (UFPR). Piper aduncum stem cuttings with 10 cm and 1/3 of the leaf area and defoliated cuttings. Stem cuttings were washed in running water for 5 minutes for subsequent use in three different substrates (medium sand sifted, vermiculite and commercial substrate Tropstrato HP®). The experiment design was completely randomized in a 2x3 factorial arrangement (cutting type x substrate), and it was evaluated the rooting percentage, mortality, shoot emission, number of roots and average length of the three largest roots after 60 days. The results confirmed that the presence of leaves in P. aduncum stem cuttings promotes adventitious rooting. The different substrates did not exert a significant influence on the performance of the cuttings in this species.

Additional key words: propagation by cuttings; pruning; growing media; non-timber forest products (NTFPS); native spice

RESUMEN

Los bosques constituyen un valioso recurso natural, principalmente cuando son productos forestales no maderables. La bioprospección y exploración sostenible de especies nativas, pueden desarrollar protocolos de producción de plántulas al potenciar la conservación de áreas de interés. La especie Piper aduncum L. se encuentra en varias regiones, presenta diversas actividades biológicas, al destacarse acciones repelente, antimicrobiana e insecticida. El objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar la influencia de la defoliación y diferentes sustratos en el processo de propagación. Para esto, un experimento fue realizado en febrero de 2016 en el Departamento de Fitotecnia y Fitosanidad, Sector de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Federal de Paraná. Se utilizaron esquejes semileñosas de Piper aduncum con 10 cm y un 1/3 del área foliar y defoliación total. Los esquejes fueron lavados por 5 minutos en corriente de agua para posteriormente usados en tres diferentes sustratos (arena tamizada, vermiculita y sustrato comercial Tropstrato HP®). El diseño experimental fue completamente al azar con arreglo factorial 2x3 (tipo de esqueje x sustrato), y fue evaluado el porcentaje de enraizamiento, mortalidad, emisión de brotes, número de raíces y longitud media de las tres raíces más largas después de 60 días. Los resultados indicaron la necesidad de las hojas en los esquejes de P aduncum para promoción del enraizamiento adventicio. Los sustratos arena, vermiculita y Topstrato no presentaron influencia significativa en el desempeño de los esquejes de la especie.

Palabras clave adicionales: propagación por estacas; poda; substratos de cultivo; produtos forestales no maderables (PFNM); pimienta nativa

INTRODUCTION

Forests, in general, constitute one of the most valuable natural resources. In addition to being biodiversity centers, they are important climate regulators, rainwater drainage, and efficient soil protectors. They are also essential sources of resources for man, producing, for example, wood, cellulose, resins, tannins and essential oils, among other non-timber forest products (NTFP) (Backes, 2009).

Prospecting native species with potential for use as NTFP seeks to minimize the impact of predatory extractivism of natural areas and subsidize the exploration of new compounds of interest in a sustainable manner. The species with potential for production of compounds of interest include the genus Piper (Piperaceae), which occupies a prominent position. Fazolin et al. (2006) highlighted the variety of compounds from mixed routes (chiquimate/acetate) generating phenylpropanoic aromatic compounds (lignans and neolignans), as well as terpenes and flavonoids. For this reason, the composition of essential oils of different species of Piperaceae in Brazil has been researched under several biological and biotechnological aspects (Mesquita et al., 2005; Pereira et al., 2008; Guerrini et al., 2009; Oliveira et al., 2013; Girola et al., 2015; Krinski et al., 2018a).

Piper aduncum L., popularly known as Monkey Pepper, is native to Tropical America and widely distributed throughout the Brazilian territory. It is considered an ombrophilous species, occurring in several forest formations, preferably in soils with a high organic matter content and humidity (Lorenzi and Mattos, 2002). Morphologically, this species is described as a bush or small tree, from 2 to 7 m, showing several nodes, with membranous or chartaceous, elliptic or elliptic-oval leaves (Maia et al., 2000).

This species presents great potential in the recomposition of degraded areas, being a colonizer of altered areas that promotes greater natural regeneration and relative density over time (Alvarenga et al., 2006). Nevertheless, the main economic interest of this species is due to the production of essential oil with varied biological properties. There are reports in the literature of yields of up to 3.5% of essential oil, and the phenyl ether dillapiol is the most frequently reported major constituent (Sousa et al., 2008; Almeida et al., 2009). Among the numerous biological activities attributed to P. aduncum oil, repellent actions (Misni et al., 2009), antimicrobial agents (Guerrini et al., 2009) and insecticide actions stand out (Pereira et al., 2008; Mesquita et al., 2005; Krinski and Foerster, 2016; Sanini et al., 2017; Krinski et al., 2018b).

According to Elias and Santos (2016), for NTFPs to present a viable alternative that stimulates conservation and promotion of community development, some relevant aspects need to be clarified, including botanical, ecological and agronomic or silvicultural knowledge of this species. In this sense, knowledge on appropriate propagation techniques is important because it is one of the initial stages in the process of domestication of species of interest, aiming at a more rational exploitation that is not based only on extractivism.

In order to provide specific knowledge on species propagation and phytochemical research, the objective of the present study was to evaluate the influence of the presence of leaves or defoliation and the use of different substrates on the vegetative propagation of P. aduncum using stem cutting.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The collection of branches with leaves from adult Piper aduncum plants (MBM396411 register) was carried out in February, 2016, at the Bom Jesus Biological Reserve, Antonina, Parana, Brazil. The plant material was moistened and conditioned in black polyethylene bags for transport to a greenhouse in the Agrarian Sciences sector of the Federal University of Parana, where it was kept under intermittent misting until the propagules were prepared.

Semiwoody stems generated cuttings with a 10 cm length and standard diagonal cut (bevel) at the base, straight in the upper portion, with 1/3 of the leaf area or total defoliation. After cutting, the propagules were washed in running water for 5 min. Solutions containing plant regulators were not used because the seedlings were produced in Environmental Protection Areas (EPA) where contaminant inputs are prohibited.

The planting was carried out in plastic tubes, 120 cm3 volume, with the three substrates: medium sand sifted, vermiculite and commercial substrate Tropstrato HP®. The cuttings were kept in a greenhouse with an intermittent nebulization of 5 s every 30 min.

The experiment design was completely randomized in a 2x3 factorial arrangement (presence or absence of leaves and three substrates), with four replications and 14 cuttings per plot, comprising 56 cuttings per treatment and a total of 336 cuttings in the experiment.

After 60 d, the percentages of survival, mortality and sprouts, average number and average length of the three largest roots were evaluated. The data were submitted to analysis of variance homogeneity with the Bartlett test, variance analysis with ANOVA and means comparison with the Tukey test at 5% probability. The statistical analysis was carried out with Assistat (Silva and Azevedo, 2016).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The analysis of variance showed that there were no differences among the substrates used; however, the presence of leaves was significant for all variables, except for percentage of cuttings with shoots. The interaction between the factors (presence or absence of leaves and substrates) was significant only for cutting mortality (Tab. 1).

Table 1 Analysis of variance for rooting percentage (ROO), percentage of mortality (MOR), percentage of cuttings with shoot emission (SHO), number of roots (NUM) and length of the three largest roots (LEN), on cuttings of Piper aduncum with and without leaves depending on different substrates. Curitiba-PR (2016). 

** significant at 1%; * significant at 5%; NS: not significant. DF: degrees of freedom; CV: coefficient of variation.

The rooting percentages in the P. aduncum cuttings ranged from 2.4 to 30.8%. The highest averages were recorded in cuttings with the presence of leaves (Tab. 2) and confirmed the interespecific variation in Piper plant propagation, as pointed out by Dosseau (2009), Chaves et al. (2014), Cunha et al. (2015), Gomes and Krinski (2016a, 2016b), and Ferriani et al. (2019).

Table 2 Mean and standard deviation of rooting percentage, mortality, sprout emission, number of roots and mean length of the three largest roots on cuttings of Piper aduncum with and without leaves depending on different substrates. Curitiba- PR (2016). 

Means followed by the same uppercase letter in the rows and lowercase in the columns do not differ from each other by the Tukey test (P≤0.05).

Ferriani et al. (2018) also verified an increase in rooting percentage responses in cuttings with leaves in three species of Piper (P. arboreun, P. cernuum and P. diospyrifolium) with indolbutyric acid (IBA) use, highlighting new study perspectives.

The mortality of P. aduncum cuttings was also lower in cuttings with the presence of leaves on the substrates sand and Topstrato, with no difference in the cuttings with and without leaves in the vermiculite substrate; however, a significant difference was observed for this variable in the commercial substrate (Tab. 2).

The percentage of cuttings with shoots did not present significant difference for this species because there were percentages of rooting or mortality that were significant and complementary (Tab. 2). In addition to higher rooting percentages, the presence of leaves in the P. aduncum cuttings promoted increases in the number and mean of the root length (Tab. 2).

The values of the rooting percentage observed for P. aduncum in our study, when compared with other species of the genus, were relatively low; however, the literature shows a high variation in the rooting potential of this species.

Stem cuttings of Piper hispidum Sw. have shown percentages higher than 85% (Cunha et al., 2015). Pescador et al. (2007) reported values higher than 60% for Piper mikanianum (Kunth). Steudel. Chaves et al. (2014) evaluated stem cuttings of three species of the genus for rhizogenic potential, where Piper hispidum Sw. and Piper tuberculatum Jacq. presented values higher than 80%, while Piper marginatum Jacq. did not exceeded 20% rooting.

With values similar to those observed in the present study, Mattana et al. (2009) reported rooting values of up to 37.5% for Piper umbellatum L. However, Gomes and Krinski (2016a), in the same species, obtained values between 37.5 and 60% rooting, without influence from the substrates. The longest cutting length (20 cm) had the best performance.

Even so, for P. aduncum, the best rooting performance in the leaf cuttings occurred because these organs are sites of synthesis of auxin and carbohydrates translocated to the base of the cuttings, accelerating the process of rooting and reducing the mortality rates (Hartmann et al., 2010). In addition to the synthesis of auxin and carbohydrates, it is probable that rooting and greater vigor in leaf cuttings are related to the synthesis of phenolic compounds that interact with auxin, inducing a greater vigor and percentage of root emission (Pacheco and Franco, 2008).

The significant difference for the mortality of the cuttings in the commercial substrate corroborated with the results obtained by Purcino et al. (2012) for two species of the genus Ocimum (O. gratissimum and O. selloi). Overall, the survival of the cuttings was low, differing from the values found by Dosseau (2009), who reported up to 90% survival in medium plagio-tropic cuttings for P. aduncum in a sand substrate. Nonetheless, the author reported up to 100% mortality for basal cuttings in a vermiculite substrate.

The increase in the number of roots and mean root length verified in our study is in agreement with other studies, such as the one by Vignolo et al. (2014), who reported a greater number and length of roots in cuttings of three mulberry cultivars with the presence of leaves, to the detriment of cuttings without leaves.

When analyzing the percentage of cuttings with shoots, although there were no significant differences for P. aduncum, other species, such as those of the genus Ocimum studied by Purcino et al. (2012), have had cuttings with whole leaves or leaves reduced by half that presented percentages of shoots higher than 97 and 1.3% live cuttings, while seedlings without leaves have maintained rates of 65 and 30%. These results corroborated the relationship between leaf maintenance, as a prerequisite for sprouting, and subsequent rooting.

Together with this factor, the longest and number of roots are probably related to a higher endogenous auxin concentration because of the presence of leaves, which favors the best development of the root system (Antunes et al., 2000).

In addition, in P. aduncum, there was greater rooting in the sand substrate and higher values for the number and length of roots in the vermiculite substrate. In another P. aduncum study in the length of propagules and substrates, Ferriani et al. (2019) observed higher rooting responses (26.5%), a lower length (10 cm), without influence from the substrates and lower results with the longest cuttings (20 cm) in a vermiculite substrate.

These data are a bit different those reported by Dosseu (2009), who found higher values of survival and number and length of roots in orthotropic and plagiotropic stem cuttings of P. aduncum in a sand substrate, as compared to vermiculite. However, in both cases, it was observed that substrates with higher porosity presented satisfactory results.

These discrepancies in the rooting percentages showed the different genetic potentials of each species for adventitious root emission and suggested the need for specific studies for each species in order to define adequate propagation protocols (Gomes and Krinski, 2016a; 2016b; 2018a; 2018b; 2019). Further studies are indicated because of the biological and environmental importance reported in many native Piper species.

Thus, because of the scarcity of studies on the vegetative propagation of P. aduncum, complementary studies involving rejuvenation techniques, application of plant regulators and the dynamics of seasonality should be carried out on the rooting of this species.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of leaves in P. aduncum stems promotes adventitious rooting. The substrates sand, vermiculite and Topstrato did not present a significant influence on the performance of P. aduncum cuttings under the conditions in which this experiment was carried out

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors are grateful to Mr. Wanderlei do Amaral for identifying and collecting this species and to the technicians of the Herbarium Curitiba Botanical Museum for the exsicate storage. The authors are also grateful to the Coordination for Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) for its support and the scholarship granted to the second author, to researcher Erik Nunes Gomes for his assistance in collecting and making the cuttings, and to Professor Cícero Deschamps (both from UFPR / Curitiba-PR) for the availability of the substrates and the greenhouse used in the experiments

BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES

Almeida, R.R., R.N. Souto, C.N. Bastos, M.H. Silva, and J.G. Maia. 2009. Chemical variation in Piper aduncum and biological properties of its dillapiole-rich essential oil. Chem. Biodivers. 9(6), 1427-1434. Doi: 10.1002/cbdv.200800212. [ Links ]

Alvarenga, A.P., S.A. Botelho, and I.M. Pereira. 2006. Avaliação da regeneração natural na recomposição de matas ciliares em nascentes na região sul de Minas Gerais. Cerne 12(4), 360-372. [ Links ]

Antunes, L.E.C., N.N.J. Chalfun, and M.A. Regina. 2000. Propagação de cultivares de amoreira-preta (Rubus spp.) através de estacas lenhosas. Rev. Bras. Frutic. 22(2), 195-199. [ Links ]

Backes, A. 2009. Floresta com Araucária: importância e usos múltiplos. pp. 303-309. In: Fonseca, C.R., A.M.M. Ramos-Costa, A.F. Souza, T.L. Dutra, A. Backes, and G. Ganade. (eds.) Floresta com araucária: ecologia, conservação e desenvolvimento sustentável. Holos, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil. [ Links ]

Chaves, F.C.M. and A.L.B. Cunha. 2014. Propagação por estaquia de Piper hispidum Sw., Piper marginatum Jacq. e Piper tuberculatum Jacq. em Manaus-AM. In: Ann. 3th Congresso Brasileiro de Recursos Genéticos. Sociedade Brasileira de Recursos Genéticos, Brasilia. [ Links ]

Cunha, A.L.B., F.C.M. Chaves, A.C. Batista, and A.F. Hidalgo. 2015. Propagação vegetativa de Piper hispidum Sw. em diferentes substratos. Rev. Bras. Plantas Med. 17(4), 685-692. Doi: 10.1590/1983-084X/14_113. [ Links ]

Dosseau, S. 2009. Propagação, características fotossintéticas, estruturais, fitoquímicas e crescimento inicial de Piper aduncum L. (Piperaceae). MSc thesis. Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, Brazil. [ Links ]

Elias, G.A. and R. Santos. 2016. Produtos florestais não madeireiros e valor potencial de exploração sustentável da floresta atlântica no sul de Santa Catarina. Ciênc. Flor. 26(1), 249-262. Doi: 10.5902/1980509821117. [ Links ]

Fazolin, M., J.L.V. Estrela, V. Catani, and C.R. Costa. 2006. Potencialidades da pimenta-de-macaco (Piper aduncum L.): características gerais e resultados de pesquisa. Documentos 103. Embrapa Acre, Rio Branco, Brazil. [ Links ]

Ferriani, A.P., C. Deschamps, W. Amaral, and L.E. Silva. 2018. Propagation of three native Brazilian Piper species by cuttings with índole butyric acid. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Hortic. 12(2), 492-500. Doi: 10.17584/ rcch.2018v12i2.7359. [ Links ]

Ferriani, A.P. , E.N. Gomes, and D. Krinski. 2019. Vegetative propagation of Piper aduncum L. (matico) using cuttings of varying lengths and different substrates. Rev. Cubana Plantas Med. 23(3), 1-9. [ Links ]

Girola, N., C.R. Figueiredo, C.F. Farias, R.A. Azevedo, A.K. Ferreira, S.F. Teixeira, T.M. Capelo, E.G. Martins, A.L. Matsuo, L.R. Travassos, and J.H. Lago. 2015. Camphene isolated from essential oil of Piper cernuum (Piperaceae) induces intrinsic apoptosis in melanoma cells and displays antitumor activity in vivo. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 467(4), 928-934. Doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.10.041. [ Links ]

Gomes, E.N. and D. Krinski. 2016a. Propagação vegetativa de Piper amalago L. (Piperaceae) em função de tipos de estaca e substratos. Cultura Agron. 25(2), 199-210. [ Links ]

Gomes, E.N. andD. Krinski . 2016b. Propagação vegetativa de Piper umbellatum L. (Piperaceae) em função de substratos e comprimentos de estacas. Rev. Sci. Agrar. 17(3), 31-37. Doi: 10.5380/rsa.v17i3.49695. [ Links ]

Gomes, E.N. andD. Krinski . 2018a. Piper crassinervium Kunth vegetative propagation: influence of substrates and stem cuttings positions. Pesq. Apl. Agrotec. 11(3), 5159. Doi: 10.5935/PAeT.V11.N3.05. [ Links ]

Gomes, E.N. andD. Krinski . 2018b. Enraizamento de estacas apicais, medianas e basais de Piper aduncum L. em diferentes substratos. Rev. Ciênc. Agrovet. 17(3), 435439. Doi: 10.5965/223811711732018435. [ Links ]

Gomes, E.N. andD. Krinski . 2019. Enraizamento de estacas caulinares de Piper crassinervium Kunth sob diferentes concentrações de ácido indolbutírico. Rev. Agric. Neotrop. 6(1), 92-97. Doi: 10.32404/rean.v6i1.1926. [ Links ]

Guerrini, A., G. Sacchetti., D. Rossi, G. Paganetto, M.A. Muzzoli, M.E. Tognolin, M.E. Maldonado and R. Bruni. 2009. Bioactivities of Piper aduncum L. and Piper obliquum Ruiz & Pavon (Piperaceae) essential oils from Eastern Ecuador. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 27(1), 39-48, Doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2008.08.002. [ Links ]

Hartmann, H., D. Kester, F. Davies, and R. Geneve. 2010. Plant propagation. Principles and practices. 8th ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. [ Links ]

Krinski, D. and L.A. Foerster. 2016. Toxicity of essential oils from leaves of Piperaceae species in rice stalk stink bug eggs, Tibraca limbativentris (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Ciênc. Agrotec. 40(6), 676-687. Doi: 10.1590/1413-70542016406021616. [ Links ]

Krinski, D., L.A. Foerster, andC. Deschamps . 2018a. First phytochemical description of essential oils from Piper cachimboense (Piperales, Piperaceae). Acta Amaz. 48(1), 70-74. Doi: 10.1590/1809-4392201703340. [ Links ]

Krinski, D., L.A. Foerster, andC. Deschamps. 2018b. Ovicidal effect of the essential oils from 18 Brazilian Piper species: controlling Anticarsia gemmatalis (Lepidoptera, Erebidae) at the initial stage of development. Acta Sci. Agron. 40, e35273-e35285. Doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v40i1.35273. [ Links ]

Lorenzi, H.E. and F.J.A. Mattos. 2002. Plantas medicinais no Brasil: Nativas e exóticas. Instituto Plantarum, Nova Odessa, Brazil. [ Links ]

Maia, J.G.S., M.G.B. Zoghbi, and E.H.A. Andrade. 2000. Plantas aromáticas na Amazônia e seus óleos essenciais. Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi, Belém, Brazil. [ Links ]

Mattana, R.S., V.F. Franco, H.O. Yamaki, C.I. Maia-Almeida, and L.C. Ming. 2009. Propagação vegetativa de plantas de pariparoba [Pothomorphe umbellata (L.) Miq.] em diferentes substratos e número de nós das estacas. Rev. Bras. Plantas Med . 11(3), 325-329. Doi: 10.1590/S1516-05722009000300015. [ Links ]

Mesquita, J.M.O., C. Cavalero, A.P. Cunha, J.A. Lombardi, and A.B. Oliveira. 2005. Estudo comparativo dos óleos voláteis de algumas espécies de Piperaceae. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 15(1), 6-12. Doi: 10.1590/695X2005000100003. [ Links ]

Misni, N., S. Sulaiman, H. Othman, and O. Baharudin. 2009. Repellency of essential oil of Piper aduncum against Aedes albopictus in the laboratory. J. Am. Mosquito Control Assoc. 25(4), 442-447. Doi: 10.2987/09-0006.1 [ Links ]

Oliveira, G.B., D.L. Moreira, A.D.R. Mendes, E.F. Guimarães, L.S. Figueiredo, M.A.C. Kaplan, and E.R. Martins. 2013. Growth study and essential oil analysis of Piper aduncum from two sites of Cerrado biome of Minas Gerais State, Brazil. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn . 23(5), 743-753. Doi: 10.1590/S0102-695X2013000500005. [ Links ]

Pacheco, J.P. and E.T.H. Franco. 2008. Substratos e estacas com e sem folhas no enraizamento de Luehea divaricata Mart. Ciênc. Rural 38(7), 1900-1906. Doi: 10.1590/84782008000700015. [ Links ]

Pereira, A.C.R.L., J.V. Oliveira, M.G.C. Gondim-Junior, and C.A.G. Camara 2008. Atividade inseticida de óleos essenciais e fixos sobre Callosobruchus maculatus (Fabr., 1775) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) em grãos de caupi [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.].. 32(3), 717724. Doi: 10.1590/S1413-70542008000300003. [ Links ]

Pescador, R., A.C. Voltolini, C.G. Girardi, and F.A.F. Rosa. 2007. Estaquia de pariparoba-do-Rio Grande do Sul sob efeito do ácido indolbutírico em dois substratos. Sci. Agrar. 8(4), 391-398. Doi: 10.5380/rsa.v8i4.9886. [ Links ]

Purcino, M., M.P. Machado and L.A. Biasi. 2012. Efeito das folhas no enraizamento de estacas de alfavaca-cravo e alfavacaanis. Rev. Ciênc. Agrovet . 11(2), 93-98. [ Links ]

Sanini, C., A. Massarolli, D. Krinski , and A.R. Butnariu. 2017. Essential oil of spiked pepper, Piper aduncum L. (Piperaceae), for the control of caterpillar soybean looper, Chrysodeixis includens Walker (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Rev. Bras. Bot. 40, 399-404. Doi: 10.1007/s40415-017-0363-6. [ Links ]

Silva, F.A.S. and C.A.V. Azevedo. 2016. Comparison of means of agricultural experimentation data through different tests using the software Assistat. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 37(11), 3527-3531. Doi: 10.5897/AJAR2016.11523. [ Links ]

Sousa, P.J.C., C.A.L. Barros, J.C.S. Rocha, D.S. Lira, G.M. Monteiro, and J.G.S. Maia. 2008. Avaliação toxicológica do óleo essencial de Piper aduncum L. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn . 18(2), 217-221. Doi: 10.1590/ S0102-695X2008000200013. [ Links ]

Vignolo, G.K., L. Picolotto, M.A. Gonçalves, I.S. Pereira, and L.E.C. Antunes. 2014. Presença de folhas no enraizamento de estacas de amoreira-preta. Ciênc. Rural 44(3), 467-472. Doi: 10.1590/S0103-84782014000300013 [ Links ]

Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia de Creative Commons

Conflict of interests: the manuscript was prepared and reviewed with the participation of the authors, who declare that there exists no conflict of interest that puts in risk the validity of the presented results

Received: June 06, 2018; Accepted: March 29, 2019

*Corresponding author. aurea.portes@hotmail.com

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License